Hao Dong v. Alejandro N. Mayorkas et al
| Hao Dong |
| Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and David M. Radel |
| 2:2023cv04183 |
| May 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| George H Wu |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Joint STIPULATION to Stay Case pending adjudication of asylum application filed by Defendants Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, David M. Radel. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Monica Antoun added to party Ur M. Jaddou(pty:dft), Attorney Monica Antoun added to party Alejandro N. Mayorkas(pty:dft), Attorney Monica Antoun added to party David M. Radel(pty:dft))(Antoun, Monica) |
| Filing 11 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Oil Appellate counsel for Defendants Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, David M. Radel. Filed by Defendants Mayorkas et al. (Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Ur M. Jaddou(pty:dft), Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Alejandro N. Mayorkas(pty:dft), Attorney Oil Appellate added to party David M. Radel(pty:dft))(Appellate, Oil) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Hao Dong, upon Defendant Ur M. Jaddou served on 6/12/2023, answer due 8/11/2023; Alejandro N. Mayorkas served on 6/12/2023, answer due 8/11/2023; David M. Radel served on 6/12/2023, answer due 8/11/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit delivered confirmation, #2 Exhibit summons)(Wang, Justin) |
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE JUDGE GEORGE H. WU by Judge George H. Wu. You are instructed to read and to follow (unless otherwise superseded herein) the Central District of California Local Rules (henceforth "Local Rules") 16-1 through 16-15 regarding pre-trial requirements. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (aco)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 21-01. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge George H. Wu for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:23-cv-04183 GW(JCx). (rn)
|
| Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, David M. Radel. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Hao Dong, (Wang, Justin) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Hao Dong. (Wang, Justin) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Hao Dong. (Wang, Justin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35400773 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Hao Dong. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Attorney Justin X Wang added to party Hao Dong(pty:pla))(Wang, Justin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
