Tomas Ramirez v. FCA US LLC et al
| Tomas Ramirez |
| FCA US LLC and Does 1 through 20, inclusive |
| 2:2023cv04204 |
| May 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Alka Sagar |
| Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. Scheduling Conference set for 8/18/2023 at 01:00 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
|
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition #8 filed by Defendant FCA US LLC.(Shepardson, Scott) |
|
Filing 12
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo to Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:23-cv-04204 FLA(ASx). (rn) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo: granting #7 Request to Substitute Attorney. (see document for details) (hr)
|
| Filing 9 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c filed by Plaintiff All Plaintiffs. The Plaintiff does not consent. (Quinn, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 8 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant FCA US LLC amending Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Plaintiff Tomas Ramirez(Barry, David) |
| Filing 7 REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEY Scott Shepardson in place of attorney Matthew M. Proudfoot filed by Defendant FCA US LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C Statement of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant FCA US LLC. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 5/25/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL)(ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 20, inclusive, FCA US LLC. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Tomas Ramirez. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 4/28/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL) (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant FCA US LLC, identifying FCA US LLC. (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Matthew M Proudfoot on behalf of Defendant FCA US LLC (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Matthew M. Proudfoot re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant FCA US LLC. (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant FCA US LLC. (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 23STCV09484 Receipt No: ACACDC-35404536 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant FCA US LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons & Complaint - State Court, #2 Answer to Complaint - State Court) (Attorney Matthew M Proudfoot added to party FCA US LLC(pty:dft))(Proudfoot, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
