Jeffrey Cheung v. 1541 Wilcox Holdings LLC et al
| JEFFREY CHEUNG |
| 1541 WILCOX HOLDINGS LLC and 6516 TOMMIE HOTEL LLC |
| 2:2023cv04276 |
| June 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 JUDGMENT by Judge Percy Anderson. Pursuant to this Court's June 20, 2023, Minute Order, which dismissed the action filed by plaintiff Jeffrey Cheung ("Plaintiff") against defendants 1541 Wilcox Holdings LLC and 6516 Tommie Hotel LLC ("Defendants"), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff's action is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to comply with the Court's Orders. RE: MINUTES IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER, #11 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (aco) |
Filing 11
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. For all of the foregoing reasons, the Court dismisses this action without prejudice both for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to comply with the Court's Orders. The Court will issue a Judgment consistent with this Order. (See document for further details). (aco)
|
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Percy Anderson. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (aco)
|
|
Filing 9
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS-COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. The Court therefore orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing why this action should not be dismissed for improper venue or transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, as a result of the forum selection clause contained in the engagement agreement. If Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint, Plaintiff's response to the Order to Show Cause shall be filed by no later than June 19, 2023. If Plaintiff elects not to file a First Amended Complaint by that date, Plaintiff need not file a Response to the Order to Show Cause and the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice to it being re-filed by Plaintiff in an appropriate alternative forum. (See document for further details). (aco)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants 1541 Wilcox Holdings LLC, 6516 Tommie Hotel LLC. (et) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (et) |
| Filing 4 *REQUEST FOR SUMMONS* filed as SUMMONS filed by Plaintiff JEFFREY CHEUNG re: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 (Greenbaum, Martin) Modified on 6/5/2023 (et). |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff JEFFREY CHEUNG, (Greenbaum, Martin) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff JEFFREY CHEUNG. (Greenbaum, Martin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35416359 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff JEFFREY CHEUNG. (Attorney Martin Bein Greenbaum added to party JEFFREY CHEUNG(pty:pla))(Greenbaum, Martin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
