Charles Nelson Ammons v. Jesse Marino et al
| Charles Nelson Ammons |
| Judge Jesse Marino, Delaney Henretty and Jeffrey Stulberg |
| 2:2023cv04299 |
| May 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Valerie Baker Fairbank |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Order Denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Charles Nelson Ammons. (hr)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank and referred to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (lh) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Charles Nelson Ammons. (lh) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Delaney Henretty(Deputy District Attorney, individual), Delaney Henretty(Deputy District Attorney, official capacity), Jesse Marino(official capacity), Jesse Marino(individual), Jeffrey Stulberg(Attorney at Law, individual), Jeffrey Stulberg(Attorney at Law, official capacity) pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank and referred to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. Filed by Plaintiff Charles Nelson Ammons. (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
