Mona Hawkins v. The United State Department of Agriculture
Plaintiff: Mona Hawkins
Defendant: The United State Department of Agriculture
Case Number: 2:2023cv04344
Filed: May 31, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Brianna Fuller Mircheff
Referring Judge: Stephen V Wilson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2023 Filing 19 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to United States Attorney General. (aco)
July 27, 2023 Filing 18 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to US Attorney's Office/DOJ. (aco)
July 27, 2023 Filing 17 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant The United State Department of Agriculture. (aco)
July 27, 2023 Filing 16 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint - (Discovery), #1 filed by plaintiff Mona Hawkins. (Attachments: #1 Summons Request 2, #2 Summons Request 3)(aco)
July 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MINUTES IN CHAMBERS ORDER REOPENING CASE by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. The Court is advised that the plaintiff complied with the order to pay the full filing fee. The plaintiff complied on July 19, 2023. Due to a clerical error the entry was not timely posted, and the case was closed in error. The Court orders that the dismissal is set aside. The case is reopened and restored to the active calendar. (Made JS-5, Case reopened) (aco)
July 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MINUTES IN CHAMBERS ORDER DISMISSING ACTION by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. The Court, on June 21, 2023, issued an order denying plaintff's request to proceed in forma pauperis, and granting an additional thirty days, to and including July 21, 2023, to pay the full filing fee. To date, plaintiff has failed to comply. The Court orders the case dismissed. (Case Terminated. Made JS-6.) (aco)
June 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
June 29, 2023 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mona Hawkins, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (rolm)
June 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (NON-PRISONER CASE) by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. The Request is DENIED because the filer has the ability to pay. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: Within 30 days of the date of this Order, the filer must do the following: Pay the full filing fee of $402.; DENYING #2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support. (aco)
June 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTES IN CHAMBERS ORDER re REQUEST FOR AN ATTORNEY filed by plaintiff #8 by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. There is no constitutional right to counsel in a civil case such as the instant proceeding. Turner v. Rogers, 564 U.S. 431, 441-42 (2011). The Court therefore will not appoint counsel in such circumstances. Plaintiff's request is accordingly denied.; denying #8 REQUEST FOR AN ATTORNEY. (aco)
June 16, 2023 Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Mona Hawkins, re Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #6 , Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #4 served on 6/13/23. (aco)
June 16, 2023 Filing 8 REQUEST FOR AN ATTORNEY filed by plaintiff Mona Hawkins. (aco)
June 7, 2023 Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mona Hawkins, upon Defendant The United State Department of Agriculture served on 6/6/2023, answer due 8/7/2023. Service was executed in compliance with statute not specified. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (aco)
June 5, 2023 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap)
June 5, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
June 5, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Brianna Fuller Mircheff. (ghap)
May 31, 2023 Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Mona Hawkins. (ghap)
May 31, 2023 Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Mona Hawkins. (ghap)
May 31, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendant The United State Department of Agriculture.Case assigned to Judge Stephen V. Wilson for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Brianna Fuller Mircheff. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Mona Hawkins. (Attachments: #1 CV-71, #2 Summons) (ghap)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mona Hawkins v. The United State Department of Agriculture
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mona Hawkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The United State Department of Agriculture
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?