Susan Lea v. United States et al
| Susan Lea |
| Jazmin Martinez, Does 1 through 20 and United States |
| 2:2023cv04425 |
| June 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Alka Sagar |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fraud |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 FIRST AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT against Defendants United States, Does 1 through 20 amending Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by plaintiff Susan Lea. (jp) |
Filing 20
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order Re: Plaintiff's Motion to Remand [DE #13 ] andDefendant's Motion to Dismiss [DE #9 ] by Judge R. Gary Klausner: The Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiffs Complaint in its entirety. The Court DENIES Plaintiffs Motion to Remand, and GRANTS Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. The Court DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiffs Complaint in its entirety. Plaintiff shall have two (2) weeks from the issuance of this Order to file any amended complaint. Further, the Scheduling Conference set for 7/24/2023, at 9:00 AM., is vacated and will be reset as necessary. (jp)
|
|
Filing 19
SCHEDULING NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES AND ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge R. Gary Klausner: Plaintiffs Motion to Remand #13 and Defendants Motion to Dismiss #9 , both calendared for hearing on 7/17/2023, have been taken under submission and off the motion calendar. No appearances by counsel are necessary. The Court will issue a ruling after full consideration of properly submitted pleadings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jre) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 18 JOINT RULE 26(f) REPORT filed by plaintiff Susan Lea. (jp). Modified on 7/5/2023 (jp). |
| Filing 17 REPLY in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case , Memorandum of Points and Authorities #9 filed by Defendant United States. (Korevec, John) |
| Filing 16 OPPOSITION to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Case ; Memorandum of Points and Authorities #9 filed by Plaintiff Susan Lea. (jp) |
| Filing 15 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to #13 filed by Defendant United States. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Denying Motion to Remand)(Korevec, John) |
| Filing 14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by defendant United States, re Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #10 served on 6/16/2023. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases, #2 Proof of Service)(Korevec, John) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand this Matter to State Court; Memo of Points and Authorities filed by plaintiff Susan Lea. Motion set for hearing on 7/17/2023 at 10:00 AM before Judge R. Gary Klausner. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (jp) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER CORRECTING CAPTION #6 by Judge R. Gary Klausner that the Caption shall be changed to read as follows: Susan Lea, Plaintiff, v. United States, and Does 1 through 20, Defendants. (jp)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 7/17/2023. Scheduling Conference set for 7/24/2023 at 09:00 AM before Judge R. Gary Klausner. (jre)
|
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (jre)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case , Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by defendant Jazmin Martinez. Motion set for hearing on 7/17/2023 at 09:00 AM before Judge R. Gary Klausner. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Kimberly A. Herbst, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Proof of Service) (Korevec, John) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by defendant Jazmin Martinez, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on 6/13/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice to State Court and Adverse Party of Removal of Civil Action to United States District Court, #2 Proof of Service)(Korevec, John) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by defendant Jazmin Martinez, re Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #5 , Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #3 served on 6/12/2023. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Proof of Service)(Korevec, John) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Substitution filed by defendant Jazmin Martinez. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Scope of Federal Employment, #2 Proposed Order Correcting Caption, #3 Proof of Service)(Korevec, John) |
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 to 20, Jazmin Martinez, filed by Plaintiff Susan Lea. Filed in State Court on 12/15/2022 Submitted with Attachment 1 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Jazmin Martinez. (Korevec, John) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Ventura County Superior Court, case number 56-2022-00573053-CL-IC-VTA No Fee Required - US Government, filed by defendant Jazmin Martinez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Certification of Scope of Federal Employment, #3 Proof of Service) (Attorney John Christopher Korevec added to party Jazmin Martinez(pty:dft))(Korevec, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
