BTL Industries, Inc. v. Dr Juventas et al
| BTL INDUSTRIES, INC. |
| DR JUVENTAS and Nastran Hashemi |
| 2:2023cv04436 |
| June 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY Re: REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Juventas #21 and REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Nastran Hashemi #22 . The Clerk cannot enter the requested relief as: A stipulation for Extension of Time to File Answer. (yl) |
| Filing 24 First STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to August 19, 2023 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Nastran Hashemi, Juventas. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Tracy Green added to party Nastran Hashemi(pty:dft), Attorney Tracy Green added to party Juventas(pty:dft))(Green, Tracy) |
| Filing 23 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff BTL Industries, Inc.to Order to Show Cause, #20 (Haj, Randy) |
| Filing 22 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Nastran Hashemi filed by Plaintiff BTL Industries, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Haj, Randy) |
| Filing 21 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Juventas filed by Plaintiff BTL Industries, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Haj, Randy) |
Filing 20
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION AS TO DR. JUVENTAS AND NASTRAN HASHEMI by Judge John A. Kronstadt. The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than August 2, 2023 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution regarding overdue responses as to Dr. Juventas and Nastran Hashemi. (See document for further details). (aco)
|
| Filing 19 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff BTL Industries, Inc., upon Defendant Nastran Hashemi served on 6/23/2023, answer due 7/14/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Nastran Hashemi in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service (Haj, Randy) |
| Filing 18 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff BTL Industries, Inc., upon Defendant Juventas served on 6/13/2023, answer due 7/5/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Julia Pineda, Person in Charge in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy (Haj, Randy) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE (Dkt. 15) by Judge John A. Kronstadt GRANTING #15 Non-Resident Attorney Ogden, Seth R. APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of BTL INDUSTRIES, INC., designating Haj, Randy R. as local counsel. (yl)
|
| Filing 16 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by BTL Industries, Inc.. (Haj, Randy) |
| Filing 15 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Seth R. Ogden to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff BTL Industries, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-35487514) filed by Plaintiff BTL Industries, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Haj, Randy) |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE filed by Pro Hac Vice attorney John W. Stevens on behalf of Plaintiff BTL Industries, Inc.. RE: Notice of Filing Fee Due. PHV fee n/a. Attorney will not be appearing as attorney of record on this case. (lt) |
|
Filing 13
STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Courts Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (tj)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE AND ORDER REGARDING TRANSFER AND/OR REASSIGNMENT OF PATENT CASE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Case transferred from Judge Dale S. Fischer to Judge John A. Kronstadt for all further proceedings. Case number now reads 2:23-cv-04436 JAK(MRWx). (rn)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO COUNSEL RE: Copyright, Patent and Trademark Reporting Requirements. Counsel shall file the appropriate AO-120 and/or AO-121 form with the Clerk within 10 days. (et) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney John W Stevens on behalf of Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Seth R. Ogden on behalf of Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Nastran Hashemi, Juventas. (et) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff BTL INDUSTRIES, INC., identifying BTL Holdings Limited Sole parent company of Plaintiff BTL Industries, Inc.. (Haj, Randy) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff BTL INDUSTRIES, INC.. (Haj, Randy) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff BTL INDUSTRIES, INC.. (Haj, Randy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35443573 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff BTL INDUSTRIES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6) (Attorney Randy R. Haj added to party BTL INDUSTRIES, INC.(pty:pla))(Haj, Randy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
