Nazli Manyas v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
Plaintiff: Nazli Manyas
Defendant: UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UR Mendoza Jaddou, Director of USCIS and Ur Mendoza Jaddou
Case Number: 2:2023cv04450
Filed: June 7, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Fernando M Olguin
Referring Judge: Rozella A Oliver
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 24, 2023 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nazli Manyas, upon Defendant Ur Mendoza Jaddou served on 7/17/2023, answer due 9/15/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Merrick Garland, Director. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Lawler, Martin)
July 24, 2023 Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nazli Manyas, upon Defendant United States Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 7/17/2023, answer due 9/15/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Merrick Garland. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. (Lawler, Martin)
June 21, 2023 Filing 10 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Errata #9 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect document is attached to the docket entry. Filings are 2 different complaints and the Court's Initial Standing Order. It is unclear what filer is attempting to correct. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (iv)
June 20, 2023 Filing 9 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Nazli Manyas. correcting Generic Text Only Entry, 8 (Attachments: #1 Document filed in error, #2 Proposed Order)(Lawler, Martin)
June 9, 2023 Filing 8 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (gga) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
June 8, 2023 Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Ur Mendoza Jaddou, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (lh)
June 8, 2023 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh)
June 8, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (lh)
June 7, 2023 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Nazli Manyas. (Attachments: #1 Supplement)(Lawler, Martin)
June 7, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Nazli Manyas, (Lawler, Martin)
June 7, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Nazli Manyas. (Lawler, Martin)
June 7, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35448157 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Nazli Manyas. (Attorney Martin J Lawler added to party Nazli Manyas(pty:pla))(Lawler, Martin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nazli Manyas v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nazli Manyas
Represented By: Martin J Lawler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Represented By: OIL-DCS Trial Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UR Mendoza Jaddou, Director of USCIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ur Mendoza Jaddou
Represented By: OIL-DCS Trial Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?