United States of America v. Southern California Edison Company et al
United States of America |
Southern California Edison Company and Does 1 to 10 |
2:2023cv04451 |
June 7, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Charles F Eick |
Michael W Fitzgerald |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Property Damage |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Southern California Edison Company identifying Edison International as Corporate Parent. (Dixon, Douglas) |
Filing 14 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN FILED DOCUMENT RE: Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents #12 regarding Answer to Complaint #11 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. A notice of interested parties shall be filed no later than 5 days from entry of this Order. (smom) |
Filing 13 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Scheduling Conference set for 8/21/2023 at 11:00 AM before Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. (rs) |
Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Answer to Complaint #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7-1.1 no notice of interested parties. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. (iv) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Southern California Edison Company.(Attorney Douglas James Dixon added to party Southern California Edison Company(pty:dft))(Dixon, Douglas) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff United States of America, upon Defendant Southern California Edison Company served on 6/27/2023, answer due 7/18/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Mrs. Crosby in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service (Green, Paul) |
Filing 9 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 23-05-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:19-cv-10262 MWF(Ex). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian and Judge John F. Walter to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:23-cv-04451 MWF(Ex). Signed by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald (rn) |
Filing 8 STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (lom) |
Filing 7 1` DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Southern California Edison Company. (et) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (et) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff United States of America. (Green, Paul) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff United States of America. (Green, Paul) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT No Fee Required - US Government, filed by Plaintiff United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (Attorney Paul Bartholomew Green added to party United States of America(pty:pla))(Green, Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.