Dyson, Inc. v. Kuehne Nagel, Inc. et al
| Dyson, Inc. |
| Kuehne + Nagel, Inc. doing business as Blue Anchor America Line, a corporation, Doe and Kuehne Nagel, Inc. a corporation doing business as Blue Anchor America Line |
| 2:2023cv04516 |
| June 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| Andre Birotte |
| Contract: Marine |
| 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 TEXT-ONLY ENTRY - RECEIVED Notice of Receipt of Electronic Case Transfer from Southern District of New York, 1:23-cv-06818 filed 8/3/2023. (rolm) |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Dyson, Inc.to Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, Set/Reset Deadlines, #12 Plaintiff's Response to Order to Show Cause (Kirsch, Joshua) |
Filing 15
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO TRANSFER ACTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Plaintiff's Request pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1404(a) and/or Section 1404(a) #13 , the Court ORDERS the immediate transfer of this action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Case transferred electronically. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated. ) (gk)
|
| Filing 13 REQUEST to Transfer Case to United States District Court for Southern District of New York filed by Plaintiff Dyson, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Kirsch, Joshua) |
|
Filing 12
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before 8/2/2023, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. See document for further details. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk)
|
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Dyson, Inc., upon Defendant Kuehne Nagel, Inc. served on 6/21/2023, answer due 7/12/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Rebecca Vang- CSC (Agent of Service) in compliance with statute not specified by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity (Kirsch, Joshua) |
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Kuehne Nagel, Inc. (et) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (et) |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Dyson, Inc. identifying Dyson, Ltd. as Corporate Parent. (Kirsch, Joshua) |
| Filing 4 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Dyson, Inc., identifying W.K. Webster & Co., Ltd.. (Kirsch, Joshua) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Dyson, Inc.. (Kirsch, Joshua) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Dyson, Inc.. (Kirsch, Joshua) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35459968 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Dyson, Inc.. (Attorney Joshua E Kirsch added to party Dyson, Inc.(pty:pla))(Kirsch, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
