Michael Saffar v. W. Z. Jenkins et al
| Michael Saffar |
| W. Z. Jenkins, Captain Sieja and Lt. Kaleta |
| 2:2023cv04544 |
| June 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Sherilyn Peace Garnett |
| Brianna Fuller Mircheff |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER (In Chambers) Order Dismissing Complaint with Leave to Amend by Magistrate Judge Brianna Fuller Mircheff: re: Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights), #1 . If Plaintiff wants to continue with this suit, he must file a First Amended Complaint no later than August 17, 2023. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 of 2, #2 Attachment 2 of 2) (es)
|
|
Filing 11
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order Re: Request to Appoint Counsel (ECF 10) by Magistrate Judge Brianna Fuller Mircheff. The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's letter requesting appointment of counsel ("Request") filed on June 16, 2023. Plaintiff's Request for appointment of counsel (ECF 10) is DENIED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff is reminded that all matters must be called to the Court's attention by appropriate application or motion, not by letter (Local Rule 83-2.5). SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. denying #10 REQUEST for Appointment of Counsel (ch)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Request Counsel filed by Plaintiff Michael Saffar. (es) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER RE: CIVIL RIGHTS CASE by Magistrate Judge Brianna Fuller Mircheff, re Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights), #1 Plaintiff is advised that the Court is presently screening the complaint in this action, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1915(e)(2). Until the complaint has been screened and the Court has ordered that service of process may occur, Plaintiff may not proceed with service of process upon Defendant(s). Should the Court determine that the complaint may be served upon Defendant(s), the Court will provide Plaintiff with instructions regarding service of process. [See document for further information.] (es)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES #4 by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. The Request is GRANTED. (iv)
|
|
Filing 7
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) MOTION TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER #2 by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. Plaintiff's ex parte Motion for injunctive relief is DENIED without prejudice. (iv)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett and referred to Magistrate Judge Brianna Fuller Mircheff. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 DECLARATION of Michael Saffar re MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support #4 filed by Plaintiff Michael Saffar. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Michael Saffar. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Michael Saffar in support of Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction #2 , filed by Plaintiff Michael Saffar. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction with Memorandum and Declaration in Support, filed by plaintiff Michael Saffar. (ghap) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants W. Z. Jenkins, Kaleta, Sieja pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents. Case assigned to Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett and referred to Magistrate Judge Brianna Fuller Mircheff., filed by plaintiff Michael Saffar. (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
