Wesley Africa v. Vision Path, Inc. et al
| Wesley Africa |
| Vision Path, Inc. d/b/a Hubble, Vision Path, Inc. and Does 1-25, inclusive |
| 2:2023cv04570 |
| June 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael R Wilner |
| George H Wu |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 STIPULATION to Continue Status conference from August 28, 2023 to September 11, 2023 filed by Plaintiff Wesley Africa. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Parties' Stipulation)(Carlson, Ryan) |
Filing 19
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge George H. Wu. After considering the Stipulation, and for good cause shown, the Court hereby GRANTS the Parties' Stipulation, and orders that the Scheduling Conference be continued to August 28, 2023 at 8:30 a.m. RE: Stipulation to Continue, #18 . (aco)
|
| Filing 18 STIPULATION to Continue Scheduling Conference from July 24, 2023 to August 28, 2023 Re: Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only, #9 filed by Plaintiff Wesley Africa. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order to Continue Scheduling Conference)(Carlson, Ryan) |
| Filing 17 DECLARATION of Ryan J. Carlson Re Venue filed by Plaintiff Wesley Africa. (Carlson, Ryan) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER ON THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT VISION PATH, INC. TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT by Judge George H. Wu. After considering the stipulation, and for good cause shown, the Court hereby GRANTS the Parties Third Stipulation and orders that Vision Paths deadline to respond to the Complaint be reset to August 14, 2023.; RE: Third STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer #15 . (aco)
|
| Filing 15 Third STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to August 14, 2023 re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Defendant Vision Path, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Branson, Timothy) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST to Substitute Counsel Eric H. De Wames, Ryan J. Carlson in place of Annette C. Clark for Plaintiff Wesley Africa #12 by Judge George H. Wu. (lc)
|
| Filing 12 REQUEST to Substitute Counsel for Plaintiff, Eric H. De Wames, Ryan J. Carlson for Counsel for Plaintiff, Annette C. Clark and Ryan J. Carlson filed by Plaintiff Wesley Africa. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Request for Approval of Substitution or Withdrawal of Attorney) (Clark, Annette) |
| Filing 11 Second STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Vision Path, Inc. answer now due 7/14/2023, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Defendant Vision Path, Inc..(Branson, Timothy) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Vision Path, Inc. answer now due 6/30/2023, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Defendant Vision Path, Inc..(Branson, Timothy) |
|
Filing 9
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS-ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge George H. Wu. The Court sets a Scheduling Conference for July 24, 2023 at 8:30 a.m. Counsel are reminded of their obligations to disclose information, confer on a discovery plan, and report to the Court, as required by F.R.C.P. 26 and the Local Rules of this Court. Trial counsel are ordered to be present. A Joint 26(f) Report shall be filed with the Court no later than July 17, 2023. See Local Rule 26-1. (aco)
|
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE JUDGE GEORGE H. WU by Judge George H. Wu. You are instructed to read and to follow (unless otherwise superseded herein) the Central District of California Local Rules (henceforth "Local Rules") 16-1 through 16-15 regarding pre-trial requirements. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (aco)
|
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (lh) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Vision Path, Inc. d/b/a Hubble, re Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 served on June 9, 2023. (Branson, Timothy) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Vision Path, Inc. d/b/a Hubble (Branson, Timothy) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Wesley Africa.(Filing fee $ 402) Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Wesley Africa. (FILED IN VENTURA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 4/28/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Vision Path, Inc. d/b/a Hubble. (Branson, Timothy) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, County of Ventura, case number 2023CUBT008371 Receipt No: ACACDC-35470388 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Vision Path, Inc. d/b/a Hubble. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Timothy K. Branson, #2 Exhibit A - Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Civil Case Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit C - Summons, #5 Exhibit D - Notice of Case Assignment, #6 Exhibit E - Updated Summons, #7 Exhibit F - Minute Order, #8 Exhibit G - Proof of Service of Minute Order, #9 Exhibit H - Proof of Personal Service) (Attorney Timothy K Branson added to party Vision Path, Inc. d/b/a Hubble(pty:dft))(Branson, Timothy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
