Faranak Ashrafi v. Chip Laitinen et al
| Faranak Ashrafi |
| Chip Laitinen and Antony Blinken |
| 2:2023cv04588 |
| June 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Sherilyn Peace Garnett |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Faranak Ashrafi, upon Defendant Antony Blinken served on 6/28/2023, answer due 8/28/2023; Chip Laitinen served on 6/28/2023, answer due 8/28/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Liz Q. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Merrick Garland. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 14 60 DAY Summons Issued re Amended Complaint/Petition #2 as to Defendant Antony Blinken, Chip Laitinen. (iv) |
| Filing 13 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #2 filed by Plaintiff Faranak Ashrafi. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #11 . The following error(s) was found: The case number and/or judge(s) initials are missing. The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write "see attached."Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (iv) |
| Filing 11 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #2 filed by Plaintiff Faranak Ashrafi. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. (pg)
|
| Filing 9 60 DAY Summons Issued re Amended Complaint/Petition #2 as to Defendants Antony Blinken, Chip Laitinen. (sh) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (sh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Faranak Ashrafi. correcting Amended Complaint/Petition #2 (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Faranak Ashrafi. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Faranak Ashrafi, (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Faranak Ashrafi. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 2 FIRST AMENDED PETITION against DEFENDANTS Antony Blinken, Chip Laitinen amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by plaintiff Faranak Ashrafi(Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35472807 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Faranak Ashrafi. (Attorney Joshua L. Goldstein added to party Faranak Ashrafi(pty:pla))(Goldstein, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
