David Cramer v. Warden Jenkins et al
Plaintiff: David Cramer and David Anthony Cramer
Defendant: Warden Jenkins, Captain Sieja, Lieutenant Kaleta, Lieutenant Banuelos, Mailroom Officer Reyna, Correctional Officer Cuevas, Correctional Officer Mora, Correctional Officer Arroyo, Correctional Officer Selgado and Unknown Doctor
Case Number: 2:2023cv04659
Filed: June 12, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Charles F Eick
Referring Judge: Sunshine Suzanne Sykes
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME [DKT. #9 ] by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes: Plaintiff is ORDERED to submit the initial portion of the filing fee within thirty days of the date of this order. Plaintiff is further advised that failure to comply with this order will result in this action being dismissed. IT IS SO ORDERED. (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (iva)
July 5, 2023 Filing 9 Letter from David Cramer (shb)
June 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER [DKT. 2] by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. Here, Cramer fails to justify his request for ex parte relief. Specifically, Cramer's Ex Parte Motion fails to provide sufficient facts to demonstrate to the Court that he would be irreparably prejudiced by having to proceed using the regular noticed motion procedure. The same is true of Cramer's underlying motion for a temporary restraining order. Cramer fails to provide sufficient facts to show he will suffer immediate irreparable injury justifying a temporary restraining order absent notice to the Defendants. Accordingly, Cramer's Ex Parte Motion is DENIED without prejudice. (lom)
June 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes: granting #4 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee. It is further ORDERED that the prisoner-plaintiff owes the Court the initial filing fee of $350.00. An initial partial filing fee of $6.00 must be paid within 30 days of the date of this order. Thereafter, monthly payments shall be forwarded to the Court in accordance with this order. (lom)
June 13, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (lh)
June 12, 2023 Filing 5 DECLARATION of David Cramer in Support of Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees re REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support #4 filed by Plaintiff David Cramer. (lh)
June 12, 2023 Filing 4 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff David Cramer. (lh)
June 12, 2023 Filing 3 DECLARATION of David Cramer in support of Plaintiffs MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction #2 filed by Plaintiff David Cramer. (lh)
June 12, 2023 Filing 2 PLAINTIFFS MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction with Memorandum and Declaration in Support, filed by Plaintiff David Cramer. (lh)
June 12, 2023 Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Arroyo(official capacity), Arroyo(individual), Banuelos(official capacity), Banuelos(individual), Cuevas(official capacity), Cuevas(individual), Jenkins(individual), Jenkins(official capacity), Kaleta(official capacity), Kaleta(individual), Mora(individual), Mora(official capacity), Reyna(official capacity), Reyna(individual), Selgado(individual), Selgado(official capacity), Sieja(individual), Sieja(official capacity), Unknown Doctor(official capacity) pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. Filed by Plaintiff David Cramer. (lh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: David Cramer v. Warden Jenkins et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Cramer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Anthony Cramer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Warden Jenkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Captain Sieja
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lieutenant Kaleta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lieutenant Banuelos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mailroom Officer Reyna
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Correctional Officer Cuevas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Correctional Officer Mora
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Correctional Officer Arroyo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Correctional Officer Selgado
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Doctor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?