Deidra Bonner v. The Walman Optical Company et al
Deidra Bonner |
The Walman Optical Company Incorrectly Named as X-Cel Specialty Contacts, Inc., a Foreign Corporation doing business as X-Cel Specialty Contracts and Does 1-20 |
2:2023cv04710 |
June 15, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Maria A Audero |
R Gary Klausner |
Christina A Snyder |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 REPLY filed by Plaintiff Deidra Bonner to Scheduling Conference - optional html form,, Set/Reset Hearing, #16 (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Engelhardt, Max) |
Filing 16 MINUTES OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE (Not Held)/STATUS CONFERENCE before Judge R. Gary KlausnerThe Court sets an Order to Show Cause Hearing for 8/14/2023 at 09:00 AM., to determine why the complaint should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Plaintiff's written response is due on or before 8/7/2023. The Scheduling Conference is continued to 8/14/2023 at 09:00 AM. Court Reporter: Katherine Stride. (jp) |
Filing 15 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 10 days, filed by Defendant The Walman Optical Company.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Schedule for Case Deadlines, #2 Exhibit ADR Form 1)(Russell, Andrew) |
![]() |
Filing 13 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Byron N. Miller to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant The Walman Optical Company (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-35663483) filed by Defendant The Walman Optical Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (Russell, Andrew) |
![]() |
Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Defendant The Walman Optical Companyto Order to Show Cause, #10 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Russell, Andrew) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (lh) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant The Walman Optical Company (d/b/a X-Cel Specialty Contacts) identifying Essilor of America, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Russell, Andrew) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant The Walman Optical Company (d/b/a X-Cel Specialty Contacts). (Russell, Andrew) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court for State of California County of Los Angeles, case number 23AHCV01047 Receipt No: ACACDC-35498501 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant The Walman Optical Company (d/b/a X-Cel Specialty Contacts). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Memorandum) (Attorney Andrew Smith Russell added to party The Walman Optical Company (d/b/a X-Cel Specialty Contacts)(pty:dft))(Russell, Andrew) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendant The Walman Optical Company. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 6/14/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 )(lh) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, The Walman Optical Company, filed by Plaintiff Deidra Bonner. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 5/9/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.