Everglory Creations, Inc. et al v. Kitsch LLC
Everglory Creations, Inc., Kai-Mou Tsai and Mr. Kai-Mou Tsai |
Kitsch LLC |
2:2023cv04834 |
June 20, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Andre Birotte |
Margo A Rocconi |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by plaintiff Everglory Creations, Inc., Kai-Mou Tsai. Dismissal is without. (Cross, Justin) |
Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by plaintiff Everglory Creations, Inc., Kai-Mou Tsai. upon Kitsch LLC waiver sent by Plaintiff on 9/12/2023, answer due 11/13/2023. Waiver of Service signed by Rebecca Cantor. (Cross, Justin) |
Filing 11 21-Day Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendant Kitsch LLC. (gk) |
Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiff Everglory Creations, Inc., Kai-Mou Tsai. (Cross, Justin) |
Filing 8 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney David J Connaughton on behalf on Plaintiffs. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71), #2 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments 1 Civil Cover Sheet CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES, 2 Civil Cover Sheet REPORT ON THE FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION REGARDING A PATENT are attached to the Complaint. Each of these documents should have been filed and entered separately under its correct event/relief. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ghap) |
Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (ghap) |
Filing 9 [DOCKET BY CLERK] REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Everglory Creations, Inc., Kai-Mou Tsai. (et) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Kai-Mou Tsai. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES, #2 Civil Cover Sheet REPORT ON THE FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION REGARDING A PATENT)(Cross, Justin) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35517246 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Kai-Mou Tsai. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Invoices and BL, #2 Exhibit USD640829, #3 Exhibit USD640413) (Attorney Justin H Cross added to party Kai-Mou Tsai(pty:pla))(Cross, Justin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.