In Re JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
| Pittsburg Unified School District |
| JUUL Labs, Inc., PAX Labs, Inc. and Ploom Inc., Altria Group Inc., Philip Morris USA Inc., Altria Client Services LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company, DOES 1-100, and DOES 1-100 |
| 2:2023cv04925 |
| June 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Courts Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (tj)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 23-05-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:23-cv-03163-JAK-MARx. Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo and Judge Fernando M. Olguin to Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:23-cv-04925-JAK-MARx. Signed by Judge John A. Kronstadt. (aco)
|
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (jtil) |
| SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Pittsburg Unified School District, attached as Exhibit 1. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Altria Group Inc.. Related Case(s): 2:23-cv-4170-JAK-MAR, 2:23-cv-4184-JAK-MAR, 2:23-cv-04188-DMG-MAR, 2:23-cv-04264, 2:23-cv-04269-JAK-MAR, 2:23-cv-04279-JAK-MAR, 2:23-cv-04749, 2:23-cv-04753; 2:23-cv-04759; 2:23-cv-04761; 2:23-cv-04832, 2:23-cv-04838; 2:23-cv-4844, 2:23-cv-4850, 2:23-cv-04913, 2:23-cv-04915, 2:23-cv-04916, 2:23-cv-04918 (Iliopoulos, Kristina) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Altria Group Inc., identifying Pittsburg Unified School District, Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA Inc., Altria Client Services LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company, JUUL Labs, Inc.. (Iliopoulos, Kristina) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Altria Group Inc. (Iliopoulos, Kristina) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Altria Group Inc.. (Attachments: #1 List of Related Cases)(Iliopoulos, Kristina) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, case number CIVMSC20-01650 Receipt No: ACACDC-35533463 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Altria Group Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2 (Part 1 of 3), #3 Exhibit 2 (Part 2 of 3), #4 Exhibit 2 (Part 3 of 3), #5 Proof of Service) (Attorney Kristina Iliopoulos added to party Altria Group Inc.(pty:dft))(Iliopoulos, Kristina) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
