David Bryant v. Tesla Motors Inc. et al
David Bryant |
Tesla Motors Inc., Roes and Does through 20, inclusive |
2:2023cv04982 |
June 23, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alka Sagar |
George H Wu |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #14 filed by Plaintiff David Bryant. (Novak, Sean) |
Filing 17 MINUTES IN CHAMBERS - ORDER by Judge George H. Wu. A Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) scheduling conference is currently set for this matter on August 10, 2023. However, Defendant has filed a Motion to Compel Arbitration which is set to be heard on September 14, 2023. In order to avoid multiple appearances, the Court continues the August 10 scheduling conference to September 14, 2023 at 8:30 a.m. Additionally, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause re Jurisdiction ("OSC," ECF No. 10). Defendant filed a response (ECF No. 12) which adequately responds to the OSC. Hence, the OSC is taken off-calendar. (aco) |
Filing 16 TEXT-ONLY ENTRY - IN CHAMBERS: by Judge George H. Wu: Counsel may appear telephonically for the scheduling conference and order to show cause set on Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 8:30 a.m. by contacting the court clerk at javier_gonzalez@cacd.uscourts.gov for dial-in information. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jag) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 15 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #14 filed by Defendant Tesla Motors Inc.. (Langberg, Aaron) |
Filing 14 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Defendant Tesla Motors Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 9/14/2023 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings, #2 Declaration of Ben Flesch in Support of Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings, #3 Declaration of Aaron D. Langberg in Support of Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings, #4 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings) (Langberg, Aaron) |
Filing 13 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 7 days, filed by Defendant Tesla Motors Inc... (Langberg, Aaron) |
Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by Defendant Tesla Motors Inc.to Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings, #10 (Langberg, Aaron) |
Filing 11 TEXT-ONLY ENTRY - IN CHAMBERS: by Judge George H. Wu: The Court, on its own motion, CONTINUES the SCHEDULING CONFERENCE and the ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE previously scheduled for 08/03/2023 to 8/10/2023 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jag) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER RE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge George H. Wu: The parties are currently scheduled to appear before this Court for an initial scheduling conference as per Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) on August 3, 2023. See Docket No. 9. The Court orders Defendant to respond to the foregoing in writing no later than July 27, 2023. (see document for further details) (bm) |
Filing 9 MINUTES IN CHAMBERS - ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge George H. Wu. The Court sets a Scheduling Conference for August 3, 2023 at 8:30 a.m. Counsel are reminded of their obligations to disclose information, confer on a discovery plan, and report to the Court, as required by F.R.C.P. 26 and the Local Rules of this Court. Trial counsel are ordered to be present. A Joint 26(f) Report shall be filed with the Court no later than July 27, 2023. See Local Rule 26-1. (rolm) |
Filing 8 STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE JUDGE GEORGE H. WU by Judge George H. Wu. You are instructed to read and to follow (unless otherwise superseded herein) the Central District of California Local Rules (henceforth "Local Rules") 16-1 through 16-15 regarding pre-trial requirements. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (sh) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Tesla Motors, Inc., identifying Tesla Motors, Inc.. (Langberg, Aaron) |
Filing 3 DECLARATION of Aaron D. Langberg re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Tesla Motors, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Langberg, Aaron) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Tesla Motors, Inc.. (Langberg, Aaron) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 23STCV10621 Receipt No: ACACDC-35543141 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Tesla Motors, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Complaint (Exhibit 1), #2 Answer (Exhibit 2)) (Attorney Aaron D. Langberg added to party Tesla Motors, Inc.(pty:dft))(Langberg, Aaron) |
CONFORMED EFILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Tesla Motors Inc.[FILED IN STATE COURT 06/21/2023 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 2 TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ](sh) |
CONFORMED EFILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Tesla Motors Inc.Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff David Bryant.[FILED IN STATE COURT 05/11/2023 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 1 TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.