Reha Ayyildiz et al v. Ur M. Jaddou et al
| Reha Ayyildiz |
| Ur M. Jaddou, E. Martin Estrada and Merrick B. Garland |
| 2:2023cv05008 |
| June 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Consuelo B Marshall |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Reha Ayyildiz, upon Defendant Merrick B. Garland served on 6/24/2023, answer due 8/23/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Merrick Garland. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Merrick B. Garland. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Merrick B. Garland. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (shb) |
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Reha Ayyildiz, upon Defendant E. Martin Estrada served on 6/24/2023, answer due 8/23/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to E. Martin Estrada. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to E. Martin Estrada. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to E. Martin Estrada, U.S. Attorney's Office. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (shb) |
| Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Reha Ayyildiz, upon Defendant Ur M. Jaddou served on 6/24/2023, answer due 8/23/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Merrick Garland. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to E. Martin Estrada. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to E. Martin Estrada, U.S. Attorney's Office. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (shb) |
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. It controls this case and may differ in some respects from the Local Rules. [See Order for details] (ys)
|
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (sh) |
| Filing 3 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendants E. Martin Estrada, Merrick B. Garland, Ur M. Jaddou. (Attachments: #1 Merrick B. Garland, #2 E. Martin Estrada)(sh) |
| Filing 2 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Reha Ayyildiz, (sh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants E. Martin Estrada, Merrick B. Garland, Ur M. Jaddou.Case assigned to Judge Consuelo B. Marshall for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg.(Filing fee $ 402 FEE PAID), filed by Plaintiff Reha Ayyildiz. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (sh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
