Christopher Mosley v. United Natural Foods, Inc. et al
| Christopher Mosley |
| United Natural Foods, Inc. and Does 1 through 50, inclusive |
| 2:2023cv05064 |
| June 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND ALL RELATED DEADLINES #13 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: Scheduling Conference continued tor 9/11/2023 at 10:00 AM; Rule 26 Meeting Report be filed by 8/28/2023. (lc)
|
| Filing 13 Joint STIPULATION to Continue Initial Scheduling Conference from August 21, 2023 to September 11, 2023 filed by defendant United Natural Foods, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Zargarof, Jennifer) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Christopher Mosley, identifying Christopher Mosley, United Natural Foods, Inc.. (Burrows, Christopher) |
| Filing 11 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Christopher L Burrows counsel for Plaintiff Christopher Mosley. Adding Christopher L. Burrows as counsel of record for Christopher Mosley for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Christopher Mosley. (Burrows, Christopher) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant United Natural Foods, Inc., for Notice to State Court and Plaintiff of Removal of Action; Notice of Assignment to U.S. Judges (Dkt 4) & other case-initiating docs served on 6/28/23. (Cruz, Anahi) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Scheduling Conference set for 8/21/2023 at 10:00 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
|
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant United Natural Foods, Inc. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 6/26/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL)(ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED IN STATE COURT ON COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 50, inclusive, United Natural Foods, Inc. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Christopher Mosley. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 5/2/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL) (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant United Natural Foods, Inc., (Zargarof, Jennifer) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant United Natural Foods, Inc.. (Zargarof, Jennifer) |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION of Anahi Cruz re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant United Natural Foods, Inc.. (Zargarof, Jennifer) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, case number 23STCV09845 Receipt No: ACACDC-35557555 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant United Natural Foods, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 misc. Los Angeles Superior Court docs, #3 Answer) (Attorney Jennifer B Zargarof added to party United Natural Foods, Inc.(pty:dft))(Zargarof, Jennifer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
