Manuela Herzer v. First Republic Bank et al
Manuela Herzer |
First Republic Bank, a California corporation, Jared Barnes, FDIC as Receiver for FIRST REPUBLIC BANK, First Republic Bank, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Does 1 through 50, inclusive |
2:2023cv05079 |
June 26, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dolly M Gee |
Steve Kim |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION TO STAY ENTIRE ACTION FOR NINETY DAYS BY FDIC AS RECEIVER FOR FIRST REPUBLIC BANK by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court hereby GRANTS Defendant FDIC's Ex Parte Application #10 and ORDERS the entire action stayed for 90 days, i.e., until 10/4/2023. (gk) |
Filing 10 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Stay Case for Ninety Days filed by Defendant Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Lex Conboy, #2 Proposed Order) (Humphreys, Scott) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Jared Barnes, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, identifying FDIC as Receiver for First Republic Bank, Jared Barnes, Manuela Herzer. (Humphreys, Scott) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, case number 20SMCV01997 with filing fee previously paid ($402 paid on 06/26/2023, receipt number 35561532), filed by Defendants Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Jared Barnes. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G) (Attorney Scott S. Humphreys added to party Jared Barnes(pty:dft))(Humphreys, Scott) |
Filing 7 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (lh) |
Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (lh) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Jared Barnes, Does, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, First Republic Bank amending Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , filed by Plaintiff Manuela Herzer (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 3/07/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 )(lh) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Jared Barnes, FDIC as Receiver for FIRST REPUBLIC BANK. (Humphreys, Scott) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, case number 20SMCV01997 Receipt No: ACACDC-35561532 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendants FDIC as Receiver for FIRST REPUBLIC BANK, Jared Barnes. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F) (Attorney Scott S. Humphreys added to party Jared Barnes(pty:dft), Attorney Scott S. Humphreys added to party FDIC as Receiver for FIRST REPUBLIC BANK(pty:dft))(Humphreys, Scott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.