Brandon Michael Mann v. Eric J. Holcomb et al
| Brandon Michael Mann |
| Eric J. Holcomb, Bob Grennes, Tammy Tschetter, Doug Klitzke, Bill Long, Candice Sarver, Unknown AAA Employees Agents, John M. Bishop, Michelle M. Skipper, Sarah Clayton and India Johnson |
| 2:2023cv05091 |
| June 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Brianna Fuller Mircheff |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE to Initial Standing Order #8 filed by Plaintiff Brandon Michael Mann (lc) |
| Filing 14 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Brandon Michael Mann. (lc) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF NON-AVAILABILITY AUGUST 22, 2023 THROUGH AUGUST 28, 2023 filed by plaintiff Brandon Michael Mann. (lc) |
Filing 11
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: The court DISMISSES the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Petitioner is DENIED leave to file an amended petition in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, for the reasons stated in Judge Walter's Orders in Case 22-7726. Petitioner is advised that the filing of further petitions to confirm the alleged arbitration award in this district may result in Petitioner being deemed a vexatious litigant. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER IN RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN FILED DOCUMENT RE: Complaint - (Discovery), #1 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. A notice of interested parties shall be filed no later than 5 days from entry of this Order. (rolm)
|
|
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
|
| Filing 10 Petitioner's Decline of ADR Program, Pre-Trial Proceedings, and Consent to Proceed before any Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff Brandon Michael Mann. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(rolm) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to defendants John M. Bishop, Sarah Clayton, Bob Grennes, India Johnson, Doug Klitzke, Bill Long, Candice Sarver, Michelle M. Skipper, Tammy Tschetter, Unknown AAA Employees Agents. (lc) |
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Brianna Fuller Mircheff. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendants John M. Bishop, Sarah Clayton, Bob Grennes, Eric J. Holcomb, India Johnson, Doug Klitzke, Bill Long, Candice Sarver, Michelle M. Skipper, Tammy Tschetter, Unknown AAA Employees Agents. (Attachments: #1 Tschetter, #2 DKlitzke, #3 BLong, #4 CSarver, #5 Unk AAA Employees, #6 Bishop, #7 MSkipper, #8 SClayton, #9 IJohnson) (jtil) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by plaintiff Brandon Michael Mann against Defendants John M. Bishop, Sarah Clayton, Bob Grennes, Eric J. Holcomb, India Johnson, Doug Klitzke, Bill Long, Candice Sarver, Michelle M. Skipper, Tammy Tschetter, and Unknown AAA Employees Agents. (Filing fee $ 402 Paid.) (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Part 3, #3 CV71) (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
