Nicholas Pugh v. Ford Motor Company et al
Plaintiff: Nicholas Pugh
Defendant: Ford Motor Company and Does 1 to 50, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2023cv05143
Filed: June 28, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha
Referring Judge: Brianna Fuller Mircheff
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Receipt of Remand by Los Angeles County Superior Court on 9/6/2023 (lc)
August 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles Superior Court - Stanley Mosk Courthouse. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles Superior Court - Stanley Mosk Courthouse. (lom)
August 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMAND [DKT. 11] by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. Thus, the court determines Defendant has failed to demonstrate the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000 and finds that diversity jurisdiction does not exist. The court, therefore, GRANTS the Motion and REMANDS the action to the Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. 23STCV10288. MD JS-6. Case Terminated. (lom)
July 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court - Central District filed by Plaintiff Nicholas Pugh. Motion set for hearing on 9/8/2023 at 01:30 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Amended Motion For Remand to State Court) (Kohen, Isaac)
July 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
July 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. Scheduling Conference set for 9/22/2023 at 01:00 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
July 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court - Central District filed by Plaintiff Nicholas Pugh. Motion set for hearing on 9/8/2023 at 01:30 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Re Motion to Remand Action To State Court) (Kohen, Isaac)
June 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, identifying State Street Corporation, Evercore Trust Company, N.A., Black Rock, Inc., The Vanguard Group and certain affiliates. (Maclear, Amy)
June 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (ghap)
June 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap)
June 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
June 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Brianna Fuller Mircheff. (ghap)
June 28, 2023 Opinion or Order CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 to 50, inclusive, Ford Motor Company. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Nicholas Pugh. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 5/8/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap)
June 28, 2023 Opinion or Order CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 6/27/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT B)(ghap)
June 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY. (Maclear, Amy)
June 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 23STCV10288 Receipt No: ACACDC-35576774 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Amy Maclear, #2 Exhibit A: Complaint, #3 Exhibit B: Answer) (Attorney Amy Patricia Maclear added to party FORD MOTOR COMPANY(pty:dft))(Maclear, Amy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nicholas Pugh v. Ford Motor Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicholas Pugh
Represented By: Isaac Kohen
Represented By: Tamara Imber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Represented By: Amy Patricia Maclear
Represented By: Petra Fakhouri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 to 50, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?