Unicolors, Inc. v. Michelle Mae Boutique et al
Plaintiff: Unicolors, Inc.
Defendant: Michelle Mae Boutique, Ashley E. Lacer, Dakota Darling Boutique, Vanessa Barkl, The Bee Chic Boutique, DOES 1-10, Tangerine Fox Enterprises, LLC a New Mexico limited liability company doing business as Tangerine Fox Market also known as Doe 1, Ashley E. Lacer an individual doing business as Michelle Mae Boutique doing business as Michellemaewholesale.com, Vanessa Barkl an individual doing business as Dakota Darling Boutique and Doe
Case Number: 2:2023cv05178
Filed: June 29, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dale S Fischer
Referring Judge: Alicia G Rosenberg
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 15, 2023 Filing 19 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Unicolors, Inc., upon Defendant Vanessa Barkl served on 8/4/2023, answer due 8/25/2023. in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service (Barrett, Trevor)
August 15, 2023 Filing 18 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Unicolors, Inc., upon Defendant Dakota Darling Boutique served on 8/4/2023, answer due 8/25/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Vanessa Barkl,Owner/Authorized to Accept Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity (Barrett, Trevor)
August 15, 2023 Filing 17 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Unicolors, Inc., upon Defendant Tangerine Fox Enterprises, LLC served on 8/14/2023, answer due 9/5/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Michelle Bonds/Registered Agent for Service of Process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service by mail and by also mailing a copy (Barrett, Trevor)
August 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer on Plaintiffs' Notice of Doe Amendment Naming Tangerine Fox Enterprises, LLC as Doe 1 #15 . See Order for specifics. (jp)
August 8, 2023 Filing 15 Notice OF DOE AMENDMENT NAMING TANGERINE FOX ENTERPRISES, LLC AS DOE 1 filed by Plaintiff Unicolors, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Barrett, Trevor)
August 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (pk)
August 1, 2023 Filing 13 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi to Judge Dale S. Fischer for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:23-cv-05178 DSF(AGRx). (rn)
July 31, 2023 Filing 12 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff Unicolors, Inc.. (Barrett, Trevor)
July 31, 2023 Filing 11 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (es)
July 28, 2023 Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Unicolors, Inc., upon Defendant Michelle Mae Boutique served on 7/11/2023, answer due 8/1/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Ashley E. Lacer/Owner in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service (Barrett, Trevor)
July 28, 2023 Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Unicolors, Inc., upon Defendant Ashley E. Lacer served on 7/19/2023, answer due 8/9/2023. in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service (Barrett, Trevor)
July 11, 2023 Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Unicolors, Inc., upon Defendant The Bee Chic Boutique served on 7/10/2023, answer due 7/31/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Kristy Lewis, Owner in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity (Barrett, Trevor)
July 3, 2023 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Vanessa Barkl, Dakota Darling Boutique, Ashley E. Lacer, Michelle Mae Boutique, The Bee Chic Boutique. (et)
July 3, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (Attachments: #1 CV11C Statement of Consent) (et)
June 29, 2023 Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Unicolors, Inc.. (Barrett, Trevor)
June 29, 2023 Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Unicolors, Inc.. (Barrett, Trevor)
June 29, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Unicolors, Inc., (Barrett, Trevor)
June 29, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Unicolors, Inc.. (Barrett, Trevor)
June 29, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35586119 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Unicolors, Inc.. (Attorney Trevor William Barrett added to party Unicolors, Inc.(pty:pla))(Barrett, Trevor)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Unicolors, Inc. v. Michelle Mae Boutique et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Unicolors, Inc.
Represented By: Trevor William Barrett
Represented By: Benjamin Firestone Tookey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michelle Mae Boutique
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ashley E. Lacer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dakota Darling Boutique
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vanessa Barkl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Bee Chic Boutique
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tangerine Fox Enterprises, LLC a New Mexico limited liability company doing business as Tangerine Fox Market also known as Doe 1
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ashley E. Lacer an individual doing business as Michelle Mae Boutique doing business as Michellemaewholesale.com
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vanessa Barkl an individual doing business as Dakota Darling Boutique
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?