Igor Bogdanovskiy v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC et al
| Igor Bogdanovskiy |
| Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, Los Angeles-M Inc. and DOES 1 through 30, inclusive |
| 2:2023cv05312 |
| July 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION #13 by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The Court has been advised that this action has been settled. The Court therefore ORDERS that this action is hereby DISMISSED without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within 90 days, to reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. This Court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (rolm)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Settlement (Joint) filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (Hooper, Donna) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC.(Hooper, Donna) |
| Filing 11 First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC answer now due 7/28/2023, filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Michael Ayzen)(Hooper, Donna) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Defendant's Motion #8 is DENIED. Defendant shall have three days from the date of this Order to file a responsive pleading, a motion complying with the Court's Local Rules and Standing Order, or stipulation to extend the time to file a responsive pleading. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk)
|
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
| Filing 8 First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Extend Time to File Answer to 7/25/2023 filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Donna Hooper, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Proposed Order) (Attorney Donna Jill Hooper added to party Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC(pty:dft)) (Hooper, Donna) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by plaintiff Igor Bogdanovskiy in Los Angeles Superior Court on 6/7/2023, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, identifying Mercedes-Benz North America Corporation. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC identifying Mercedes-Benz North America Corporation as Corporate Parent. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 23VECV02483 Receipt No: ACACDC-35606964 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A to Notice of Removal) (Attorney Soheyl Tahsildoost added to party Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC(pty:dft))(Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
