James Jackson v. Uniserve Project Management Services, Inc. et al
| James Jackson |
| Uniserve Project Management Services, Inc., Uniserve Facilities Services Corporation and Does 1 through 50, inclusive |
| 2:2023cv05369 |
| July 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge R. Gary Klausner: Before the Court is Plaintiff's Notice of Dismissal #15 filed on 8/30/2023. The Court hereby denies the Motion to Dismiss #13 as MOOT and all dates are vacated. The clerk shall close this action. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp) |
| Filing 15 Notice of Dismissal Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a) or (c) filed by Plaintiff James Jackson. (Kazandjian, Haig) |
Filing 14
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 9/11/2023. Scheduling Conference set for 9/18/2023 at 09:00 AM before Judge R. Gary Klausner. (jre)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by Defendants Uniserve Facilities Services Corporation, Uniserve Project Management Services, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 9/11/2023 at 09:00 AM before Judge R. Gary Klausner. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Declaration of Jennifer Yu in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #3 Exhibit A to the Declaration of Jennifer Yu, #4 Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #5 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Dismiss) (Rosenfeld, Jeffrey) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner re: MOTION to Dismiss Complaint #11 . The following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order for the following reason(s): Other error(s) with document(s): Memorandum contains single spaced text in violation of L.R. 11-3.6. Counsel shall have until 8/15/2023 to file a corrected motion. (jre)
|
| Filing 11 (DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER #12 ) - NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by Defendants Uniserve Facilities Services Corporation, Uniserve Project Management Services, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 9/11/2023 at 09:00 AM before Judge R. Gary Klausner. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Declaration of Jennifer Yu in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #3 Exhibit A to the Declaration of Jennifer Yu, #4 Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #5 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Dismiss) (Rosenfeld, Jeffrey) Modified on 8/11/2023 (jre). |
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (jre)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson to Judge R. Gary Klausner for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Michael R.Wilner. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:23-cv-05369 RGK(MRWx). (rn) |
| Filing 8 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Defendants Uniserve Facilities Services Corporation, Uniserve Project Management Services, Inc.. (Attorney Jessica A McElroy added to party Uniserve Facilities Services Corporation(pty:dft), Attorney Jessica A McElroy added to party Uniserve Project Management Services, Inc.(pty:dft))(McElroy, Jessica) |
| Filing 7 STATEMENT consent to proceed before a Unite States Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff James Jackson (Kazandjian, Haig) |
| Filing 6 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (hr) |
| Filing 5 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to James Jackson answer now due 8/11/2023, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),,,, #1 filed by Defendants Uniserve Facilities Services Corporation; Uniserve Project Management Services, Inc..(Rosenfeld, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (Attachments: #1 CV11C Statement of Consent) (et) |
| CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Uniserve Facilities Services Corporation, Uniserve Project Management Services, Inc., Does 1 through 5, inclusive, filed by Plaintiff James Jackson. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 5/31/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT A TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 . (et) |
| CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS Executed by Plaintiff James Jackson, upon Defendant Uniserve Facilities Services Corporation served on 6/9/2023, answer due 6/30/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Howard M Knee-Blankrome in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service on 6/9/2023 by Nelva Montana-Copy Specialist. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 6/4/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT I TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 . (et) |
| CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS Executed by Plaintiff James Jackson, upon Defendant Uniserve Project Management Services, Inc. served on 6/7/2023, answer due 6/28/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Howard M. Knee in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service by Cheryl Gleico- Person in Charge of Office on 6/7/2023. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 6/22/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT J TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 . (et) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendants Uniserve Facilities Services Corporation, Uniserve Project Management Services, Inc. (Rosenfeld, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Uniserve Facilities Services Corporation, Uniserve Project Management Services, Inc.. (Rosenfeld, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 23STCV12245 Receipt No: ACACDC-35613342 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendants Uniserve Facilities Services Corporation, Uniserve Project Management Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Summons on Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - Civil Case Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit D - Notice of Case Assignment, #5 Exhibit E - First Amended Gedneral Order re: Mandatory Electronic Filing, #6 Exhibit F - Alternate Dispute Resolution Packet, #7 Exhibit G - Voluntary Efficient Litigation Stipulation Packet, #8 Exhibit H - Notice of Case Management Conference, #9 Exhibit I - Proof of Service by Substituted Service, #10 Exhibit J - Proof of Service by Substituted Service, #11 Exhibit K - Collective Bargaining Agreement, #12 Exhibit L - State Court Notice of Removal of Action to the United States District Court) (Attorney Jeffrey Rosenfeld added to party Uniserve Facilities Services Corporation(pty:dft), Attorney Jeffrey Rosenfeld added to party Uniserve Project Management Services, Inc.(pty:dft))(Rosenfeld, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
