Pamela Packham v. Concentra Health Services, Inc. et al
| Pamela Packham |
| Concentra Health Services, Inc. and DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive, |
| 2:2023cv05519 |
| July 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Concentra Health Services, Inc.. Related Case(s): 3:17-cv-06875-JCS; San Diego Superior 37-2017-00015343 (Chemers, Alexander) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED PARTIES AND DISCLOSURE STATEMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH FRCP 7.1 AND LOCAL RULE 7.1-1 / CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Concentra Health Services, Inc., (Chemers, Alexander) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Concentra Health Services, Inc.. (Chemers, Alexander) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 23STCV13114 Receipt No: ACACDC-35642530 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Concentra Health Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Other State Docs Served, #3 Exhibit C - Answer, #4 Declaration of Alexander M. Chemers, #5 Declaration of Danielle Kendall) (Attorney Alexander Miller Chemers added to party Concentra Health Services, Inc.(pty:dft))(Chemers, Alexander) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
