Amelia Blackburn et al v. ETSY, INC.
| ETSY, INC. |
| Taylor Blackburn and Amelia Blackburn |
| 2:2023cv05711 |
| July 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS-COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. The hearing calendared for October 16, 2023, is vacated and the matter taken off calendar. For all of the foregoing reasons, the Court grants Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint, if any, shall be filed by no later than November 6, 2023. Failure to file a First Amended Complaint by that date may, without further warning, result in the Court deeming Plaintiffs to have stood on their Complaint and the dismissal of the original Complaint without leave to amend and with prejudice. (See document for further details).; granting #15 MOTION to Dismiss Case. (aco)
|
|
Filing 19
IN CHAMBERS ORDER TAKING MOTION UNDER ADVISEMENT by Judge Percy Anderson. A hearing on the MOTION to Dismiss Case #15 is scheduled for October 16, 2023, at 1:30 p.m. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, the Court finds this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. The hearing calendared for October 16, 2023, is vacated and the matter taken off calendar. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kss) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 18 REPLY In Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #15 filed by Defendant Etsy, Inc.. (Ring, Rosemarie) |
| Filing 17 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #15 filed by Plaintiff Amelia Blackburn. (Haderlein, Jonathan) |
| Filing 16 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Etsy, Inc. (Ring, Rosemarie) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant ETSY, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 10/16/2023 at 01:30 PM before Judge Percy Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, #2 Declaration of A. Schwing in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, #3 Exhibit 1 to Declaration of A. Schwing, #4 Exhibit 2 to Declaration of A. Schwing, #5 Exhibit 3 to Declaration of A. Schwing, #6 Proposed Order) (Ring, Rosemarie) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS (L.R. 8-3) by Judge Percy Anderson. The Court, having considered the Joint Stipulation and finding good cause therefor, hereby GRANTS the Parties' Stipulation and ORDERS as follows: 1. Defendant's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint is extended to September 14, 2023. RE: Stipulation Extending Time to Answer #13 . (aco)
|
| Filing 13 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to All Defendants, filed by Defendant ETSY, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Rosemarie T Ring added to party ETSY, Inc.(pty:dft))(Ring, Rosemarie) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Amelia Blackburn, upon Defendant ETSY, Inc. served on 7/25/2023, answer due 8/15/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Koy Saechao, Person Authorized for Service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity (Haderlein, Jonathan) |
| Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant ETSY, Inc. (aco) |
| Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Amelia Blackburn. (Haderlein, Jonathan) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #8 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (rolm) |
| Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Amelia Blackburn. (Haderlein, Jonathan) |
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Percy Anderson. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (aco)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Amelia Blackburn, (Haderlein, Jonathan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant Amelia Blackburn. (Haderlein, Jonathan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35676858 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Amelia Blackburn. (Attorney Jonathan James Haderlein added to party Amelia Blackburn(pty:bkmov))(Haderlein, Jonathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
