John William Kaipo Enos et al v. The Walt Disney Company et al
| John William Kaipo Enos and Johnson Entertainment LLC |
| The Walt Disney Company, Disney Enterprises, Inc. and Does 1-10, inclusive |
| 2:2023cv05790 |
| July 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Christina A Snyder |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiffs John William Kaipo Enos, Johnson Entertainment LLC. upon Disney Enterprises, Inc. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 7/25/2023, answer due 9/25/2023; The Walt Disney Company waiver sent by Plaintiff on 7/25/2023, answer due 9/25/2023. Waiver of Service signed by Heiko Schultz. (Aaronson, David) |
Filing 12
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (pk)
|
| Filing 11 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by John William Kaipo Enos, Johnson Entertainment LLC. (Aaronson, David) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE due to self-recusal pursuant to this Court's General Order in the Matter of Assignment of Cases and Duties to the District Judges.by Judge Christina A. Snyder. Case transferred from Judge Christina A. Snyder to the calendar of Judge Dale S. Fischer for all further proceedings. Case number now reads as 2:23-cv-05790 DSF(MRWx). (rn)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO COUNSEL RE: Copyright, Patent and Trademark Reporting Requirements. Counsel shall file the appropriate AO-120 and/or AO-121 form with the Clerk within 10 days. (lh) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants Disney Enterprises, Inc., The Walt Disney Company. (lh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs All Plaintiffs, (Aaronson, David) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs John William Kaipo Enos, Johnson Entertainment LLC. (Aaronson, David) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs John William Kaipo Enos, Johnson Entertainment LLC. (Aaronson, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35688795 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiffs John William Kaipo Enos, Johnson Entertainment LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Attorney David Gabriel Aaronson added to party John William Kaipo Enos(pty:pla), Attorney David Gabriel Aaronson added to party Johnson Entertainment LLC(pty:pla))(Aaronson, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
