C and C Market et al v. United States of America
Plaintiff: C and C Market and Seong Ro Choi
Defendant: United States of America
Case Number: 2:2023cv05914
Filed: July 21, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Andre Birotte
Referring Judge: Patricia Donahue
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND CANCELLING HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 9/29/2023 AT 10:00 AM by Judge Andre Birotte Jr: Having reviewed the Notice of Withdrawal #24 , IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction #12 is withdrawn. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the hearing regarding the Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction for 9/29/2023 at 10:00 AM is cancelled. (gk)
September 7, 2023 Filing 24 Notice of Withdrawal of Motion for Preliminary Injunction, #12 filed by Plaintiffs C and C Market, Seong Ro Choi. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Tapp, Andrew)
August 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Andrew Z. Tapp to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs C & C Market and Seong Ro Choi, designating Mubarak Malik as local counsel #16 . (gk)
August 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MINUTES [In Chambers] ORDER DENYING Joint Stipulation #20 by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. In light of the Court's August 11, 2023 Order #21 , the parties' Joint Stipulation #20 is DENIED AS MOOT. (rolm)
August 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MINUTES [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER RE: Ex Parte Application #13 by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The Court ORDERS as follows: The Government's time to Oppose Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction is extended to September 8, 2023. The Motion Hearing is CONTINUED to September 29, 2023 at 10:00 a.m. USDA is ORDERED NOT to initiate Plaintiff's disqualification prior to a ruling from the Court on the Motion for Preliminary Injunction. The Government's Ex Parte Application is DENIED as MOOT. (rolm)
August 11, 2023 Filing 20 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response and Proposed Briefing Schedule as to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re Prohibiting Defendant from disabling, suspending or terminating Plaintiffs' ability to participate in SNAP and accept EBT payments #12 filed by Defendant United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Varshovi, Zakariya)
August 10, 2023 Filing 19 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File Its Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction #13 filed by Defendant United States of America. (Varshovi, Zakariya)
August 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: Ex Parte Application by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court has reviewed the Government's Ex Parte Application for Extension ofTime to File its Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction #13 . The Court has also reviewed the underlying Motion for Preliminary Injunction, currently set for hearing on 9/1/2023. The Court is not inclined to delay hearing on the Preliminary Injunction until after Plaintiffs' snap benefits are suspended. With this in mind, the government is instructed to file a Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition on or before 8/11/2023. The government's Reply shall (1) state precisely when Plaintiffs' six-month disqualification under 7 C.F.R. Section 278.6(e)(5) will, absent intervention, begin; and (2) respond to Plaintiffs' proposal that their "SNAP licensure... remain active during the pendency of the Court's consideration of the preliminary injunction motion." Court Reporter: N/A. (gk)
August 8, 2023 Filing 17 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Andrew Z. Tapp to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs C and C Market, Seong Ro Choi (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500.00 Previously Paid on 7/21/2023, Receipt No. 35713854) #16 . The following error(s) was/were found: Case information is incomplete. DJ and MJ initials missing on application and proposed order. Please note DJ and MJ Notice of Assignment, dated 7/21/23, Dkt. 7. (lt)
August 7, 2023 Filing 16 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Andrew Z. Tapp to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs C and C Market, Seong Ro Choi (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500.00 Previously Paid on 7/21/2023, Receipt No. 35713854) filed by Plaintiffs C and C Market, Seong Ro Choi. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Malik, Mubarak)
August 7, 2023 Filing 15 Opposition Opposition to Defendant's Ex Parte Application re: EX PARTE APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File Its Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction #13 Plaintiffs' Response in Opposition to Defendant's Ex Parte Application to Extend United States' Time to Respond to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Plaintiffs C and C Market, Seong Ro Choi. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Malik, Mubarak)
August 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr: The following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Court's Case Management Order: Pro Hac Vice Application filed 7/21/2023 #6 , for the following reasons: Plaintiff may refile with an editable proposed order. (gk)
August 4, 2023 Filing 13 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File Its Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Defendant United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Zakariya Koorosh Varshovi added to party United States of America(pty:dft)) (Varshovi, Zakariya)
July 25, 2023 Filing 12 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re Prohibiting Defendant from disabling, suspending or terminating Plaintiffs' ability to participate in SNAP and accept EBT payments filed by Plaintiffs C and C Market, Seong Ro Choi. Motion set for hearing on 9/1/2023 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Proposed Order) (Malik, Mubarak)
July 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
July 21, 2023 Filing 10 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant United States of America. (ghap)
July 21, 2023 Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap)
July 21, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
July 21, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (ghap)
July 21, 2023 Filing 6 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER ON 8/4/2023, SEE DOCKET NO. 14] APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Andrew Z. Tapp to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs C & C Market, a California Sole Proprietorship, Seong Ro Choi (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-35713854) filed by Plaintiffs C & C Market, a California Sole Proprietorship, Seong Ro Choi. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Malik, Mubarak) Modified on 8/7/2023 (gk).
July 21, 2023 Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT of Plaintiff, C & C Market filed by Plaintiffs C & C Market, a California Sole Proprietorship, Seong Ro Choi (Malik, Mubarak)
July 21, 2023 Filing 4 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs C & C Market, a California Sole Proprietorship, Seong Ro Choi, (Malik, Mubarak)
July 21, 2023 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by Plaintiffs C & C Market, a California Sole Proprietorship, Seong Ro Choi. (Attachments: #1 Request for Summons-Attorney General, #2 Request for Summons-USDA-FNS)(Malik, Mubarak)
July 21, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs C & C Market, a California Sole Proprietorship, Seong Ro Choi. (Malik, Mubarak)
July 21, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35713679 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiffs C & C Market, a California Sole Proprietorship, Seong Ro Choi. (Attorney Mubarak Malik added to party C & C Market, a California Sole Proprietorship(pty:pla), Attorney Mubarak Malik added to party Seong Ro Choi(pty:pla))(Malik, Mubarak)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: C and C Market et al v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: C and C Market
Represented By: Mubarak Malik
Represented By: Andrew Z. Tapp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Seong Ro Choi
Represented By: Mubarak Malik
Represented By: Andrew Z. Tapp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Represented By: Zakariya Koorosh Varshovi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?