Jardine Gougis v. William Ira Nelson et al
| Jardine Gougis |
| William Ira Nelson, Jr. and Does 1 to 10 |
| 2:2023cv06009 |
| July 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| Stanley Blumenfeld |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 STATEMENT re: Order Granting Application for Stay and Early Mediation filed by Plaintiff Jardine Gougis re: Order on Application to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation (ADR-22), #14 . (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 14 MINUTES OF ADA STAY FOR EARLY MEDIATION by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: Granting #13 APPLICATION to Stay Case re Early Mediation ADA Disability Access Litigation as to Defendant. This action is stayed for 90 days (from application) until 11/28/2023. This case is referred to ADR Procedure No. 2. The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than 10/27/2023. A scheduling conference is hereby set for 1/5/2024 at 8:30 AM. See document for further details. (gk) |
| Filing 13 First APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by DEFENDANT William Ira Nelson, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order ADR 22) (Attorney Kirk G Downing added to party William Ira Nelson, Jr(pty:dft)) (Downing, Kirk) |
Filing 12
ORDER DECLINING SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION AND DISMISSING UNRUH ACT CLAIM by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. Accordingly, the Court exercises its discretion to decline supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Unruh Act claim, and that claim is DISMISSED without prejudice. (lom)
|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Jardine Gougisto Order to Show Cause,, #10 re: supplemental jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Kim, Jason) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The Court ORDERS Plaintiff within 14 days after entry of this Order to show cause in writing why the Court should not dismiss without prejudice her Unruh Act claim under Section 1367(c)(4). Plaintiffs response must identify the amount of statutory damages Plaintiff seeks to recover. If Plaintiff fails to file a response within 14 days after entry of this Order, the Court will decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over her Unruh Act claim, and the Unruh Act claim will be automatically dismissed without prejudice without further order of the Court. See document for further details. (gk)
|
|
Filing 9
CIVIL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant William Ira Nelson, Jr. (lh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Jardine Gougis. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jardine Gougis. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35732443 - Fee: $402. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party Jardine Gougis(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
