Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company et al v. Berendo, Inc.
Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company, Arch Specialty Insurance Company, Steadfast Insurance Company, Landmark American Insurance Company, Aspen Insurance UK Limited and Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company |
Berendo, Inc. |
2:2023cv06079 |
July 27, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Stephanie S Christensen |
Wesley L Hsu |
Other Statutes: Arbitration |
09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 ORDER ON UNOPPOSED AMENDED MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PETITIONERS' PETITION TO VACATE OR CORRECT INSURANCE APPRAISAL AWARD #23 by Judge Wesley L. Hsu. The Court hereby GRANTS the Motion and ORDERS that Respondent's Response to Petitioners' Petition to Vacate or Correct Insurance Appraisal Award is to be filed by October 2, 2023. (lom) |
Filing 23 Amended NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Extend Time to File Answer to 10/2/2023 filed by Respondent Berendo, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Furtado, David) |
Filing 22 ORDER ON MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PETITIONERS' PETITION TO VACATE OR CORRECT INSURANCE APPRAISAL AWARD #21 by Judge Wesley L. Hsu. The Court hereby GRANTS the Motion and ORDERS that Respondent's Response to Petitioners' Petition to Vacate or Correct Insurance Appraisal Award is to be filed by September 18, 2023. (lom) |
Filing 21 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Extend Time to File Answer to 9/18/2023 filed by Respondent Berendo, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER ON MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PETITIONERS PETITION TO VACATE OR CORRECT INSURANCE APPRAISAL AWARD) (Furtado, David) |
Filing 20 DECLARATION of David J. Furtado as Lead Trial counsel filed by Respondent Berendo, Inc.. (Furtado, David) |
Filing 19 Notice and CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Respondent Berendo, Inc., (Furtado, David) |
Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney David J Furtado on behalf of Respondent Berendo, Inc. (Attorney David J Furtado added to party Berendo, Inc.(pty:res))(Furtado, David) |
Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Martina Smigura on behalf of Respondent Berendo, Inc. (Attorney Martina Smigura added to party Berendo, Inc.(pty:res))(Smigura, Martina) |
Filing 16 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT UPON RECUSAL by Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment Discovery pursuant to General Order 05-07. Case randomly reassigned from Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue to Magistrate Judge Stephanie S. Christensen for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2;23-cv-06079 WLH(SSCx). (rn) |
Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company, Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company, Landmark American Insurance Company, Steadfast Insurance Company, Arch Specialty Insurance Company, Aspen Insurance UK Limited, upon Defendant Berendo, Inc. served on 8/9/2023, answer due 8/30/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Churan, Amy) |
Filing 14 21 DAY Summons Issued re Petition #1 as to Respondent Berendo, Inc. (lom) |
Filing 13 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening),,, #1 filed by Plaintiffs Arch Specialty Insurance Company, Aspen Insurance UK Limited, Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company, Landmark American Insurance Company, Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company, Steadfast Insurance Company. (Churan, Amy) |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request, #4 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (lom) |
Filing 11 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT UPON RECUSAL by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment Discovery pursuant to General Order 05-07. Case randomly reassigned from Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver to Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:23-cv-06079 WLH(PDx). (rn) |
Filing 10 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE WESLEY L. HSU. (hc) |
Filing 9 ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE due to self-recusal pursuant to this Court's General Order in the Matter of Assignment of Cases and Duties to the District Judges.by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Case transferred from Judge Otis D. Wright, II to the calendar of Judge Wesley L. Hsu for all further proceedings. Case number now reads as 2:23-cv-06079 WLH(RAOx). (rn) |
Filing 8 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 23-05. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Dean D. Pregerson to Judge Otis D. Wright, II for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:23-cv-06079 ODW(RAOx). (rn) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (lh) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Corporate Disclosure Statement, #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71), #2 , Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening),,, #1 filed by Petitioner Arch Specialty Insurance Company, Aspen Insurance UK Limited, Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company, Landmark American Insurance Company, Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company, Steadfast Insurance Company. (Churan, Amy) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Petitioners Arch Specialty Insurance Company, Aspen Insurance UK Limited, Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company, Landmark American Insurance Company, Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company, Steadfast Insurance Company (Churan, Amy) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Petitioners Arch Specialty Insurance Company, Aspen Insurance UK Limited, Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company, Landmark American Insurance Company, Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company, Steadfast Insurance Company. (Churan, Amy) |
Filing 1 PETITION To Vacate Or Correct Insurance Appraisal Award Receipt No: ACACDC-35746902 - Fee: $402, filed by Petitioner Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company, Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company, Landmark American Insurance Company, Steadfast Insurance Company, Arch Specialty Insurance Company, Aspen Insurance UK Limited. (Attorney Amy M Churan added to party Arch Specialty Insurance Company(pty:pet), Attorney Amy M Churan added to party Aspen Insurance UK Limited(pty:pet), Attorney Amy M Churan added to party Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company(pty:pet), Attorney Amy M Churan added to party Landmark American Insurance Company(pty:pet), Attorney Amy M Churan added to party Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company(pty:pet), Attorney Amy M Churan added to party Steadfast Insurance Company(pty:pet))(Churan, Amy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.