Forrest Kendrid v. Ekanem et al
| Forrest Kendrid |
| Ekanem, Salazar, V. Garcia, Callis and Inneh |
| 2:2023cv06155 |
| July 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 TEXT-ONLY ENTRY - RECEIVED Notice of Receipt of Electronic Case Transfer from California Northern District, 3:23-cv-04020 filed 8/9/2023. (rolm) |
Filing 4
ORDER TRANSFERRING ACTION TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA by Judge R. Gary Klausner, this action is transferred to that United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Case transferred electronically. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (et)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (car) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Forrest Kendrid. (car) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants pursuant to 42 USC 1983. Case assigned to Judge R. Gary Klausner and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani, filed by Plaintiff Forrest Kendrid. (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
