Joel Marin Garcia v. City of Pomona
| Joel Marin Garcia |
| City of Pomona and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2023cv06262 |
| August 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stephanie S Christensen |
| Otis D Wright |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER that the Scheduling Conference is set for December 4, 2023 at 1:30 PM ; compliance with FRCP 16, and 26(f) and filing of joint report; Counsel for plaintiff shall immediately serve this Order on all parties, including any new parties to the action by Judge Otis D Wright, II. (lc)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant City of Pomona, (Redford, Jonathan) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #2 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant City of Pomona.(Redford, Jonathan) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFFS FOURTH AND FIFTH CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT CITY OF POMONA TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT TO SEPTEMBER 29, 2023 #11 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (lc)
|
| Filing 11 Joint STIPULATION for Order DISMISSING PLAINTIFFS FOURTH AND FIFTH CLAIMS AND EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT CITY OF POMONA TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT filed by Defendant City of Pomona. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Jonathan D Redford added to party City of Pomona(pty:dft))(Redford, Jonathan) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY- No mandatory chambers copies required, EXCEPT FOR EXCEPT FOR motions for summary judgment and any other evidence-heavy motions. The Courts Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) allows people without lawyers who have pending cases in the US District Court for the Central District of California to submit documents electronically to the Clerks Office The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to Courts Website and Judges procedures for information as applicable. (lc)
|
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #2 as to Defendant City of Pomona. (jtil) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Stephanie S Christensen. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #1 filed by Plaintiff Joel Marin Garcia. (Peacock, Gregory) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Joel Marin Garcia, identifying City of Pomona. (Peacock, Gregory) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Plaintiff Joel Marin Garcia.. (Peacock, Gregory) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35782517 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Joel Marin Garcia. (Attorney Gregory Paul Peacock added to party Joel Marin Garcia(pty:pla))(Peacock, Gregory) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Joel Marin Garcia. (Peacock, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
