Orna Manavi v. Costco Wholesale et al
| ORNA MANAVI |
| COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION;, COSTCO WAREHOUSE MARINA DEL REY, COSTCO WHOLESALE STORE #479, COSTCO WHOLESALE, COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP, CESAR AGUILA, Costco Wholesale Corporation, Costco Wholesale Store No. 479 and Does 1-50 inclusive |
| 2:2023cv06280 |
| August 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 Notice filed by Defendant Cesar Aguila. (Flock, John) |
| Filing 20 RESPONSE filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporationto Order to Show Cause, #16 (Attachments: #1 Declaration DECLARATION OF CESAR AGUILA IN RESPONSE TO COURTS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE REMANDED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION)(Flock, John) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Notice of Association of Counsel #17 . The following error(s) was/were found: Notice of Association of Counsel not signed by Arias Sanguinetti Wang and Torrijos LLP. Information incorrect for Mike Arias In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak) |
| Filing 18 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Orna Manavito Order to Show Cause, #16 (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Hamed Yazdanpanah in Support of Response to Order to Show Cause Why Action Should Not Be Remanded for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, #2 Exhibit Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Response to Order to Show Cause Why Action Should Not Be Remanded for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction)(Arias, Mickel) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Association of Counsel associating attorney Mike Arias, Craig S. Momita and Travis M. Daniels on behalf of Plaintiff Orna Manavi. Filed by Plaintiff Orna Manavi (Yazdanpanah, Hamed) |
Filing 16
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE REMANDED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: The parties are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing only, within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order.As Defendant is the party asserting federal jurisdiction, Defendants failure to respond timely and adequately to this Order shall result in remand of the action without further notice. (lc) Modified on 9/11/2023 (lc).
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER STRIKING FILED DOCUMENTS FROM THE RECORD by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: the documents listed below were improperly filed for the following reasons: Failure to comply with Local Rule 6-1.; therefore, the following document(s) shall be stricken from the record and shall not be considered by the Court: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #14 . (lc)
|
| Filing 14 (STRICKEN PER 9/7/2023 ORDER DOCKET NO. 15). NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Orna Manavi. Motion set for hearing on 9/8/2023 at 01:30 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Proposed Order) (Yazdanpanah, Hamed) Modified on 9/7/2023 (lc). |
|
Filing 13
ORDER by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Hearing Motion to Remand to State Court First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #12 , for the following reasons: Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or not timely. (lc)
|
| Filing 12 (STRICKEN PER 8/31/2023 ORDER DOCKET NO. 13).First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Hearing Motiion to Remand to State Court , First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff's attorney Orna Manavi. Motion set for hearing on 9/15/2023 at 01:30 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (Yazdanpanah, Hamed) Modified on 8/31/2023 (lc). |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN FILED DOCUMENT RE: Plaintiff's NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #7 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. The document is stricken. (lc) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. Scheduling Conference set for 10/13/2023 at 01:00 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
|
|
Filing 9
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #7 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed document was not submitted or was not submitted as a separate attachment. Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or untimely. Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or untimely. Motion is Not set on Judge's Motion calendar... hearing information left blank. Proposed order filed within the Motion as one pdf and not submitted as a separate attachment. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
| Filing 7 (STRICKEN PER 8/28/2023 COURT'S G112B RESPONSE DOCKET NO. 11). NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff's attorney Orna Manavi. (Yazdanpanah, Hamed) Modified on 8/28/2023 (lc). |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero to Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:23-cv-06280 FLA(KSx). (rn) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation.(Flock, John) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Cesar Aguila, Costco Warehouse Marina Del Rey, Costco Wholesale, Costco Wholesale Corp, Costco Wholesale Corporation, Costco Wholesale Store No. 479, Does, filed by Plaintiff Orna Manavi. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION;, identifying ORNA MANAVI; COSTCO WHOLESALE; COSTCO WAREHOUSE MARINA DEL REY; COSTCO WHOLESALE STORE #479; COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION; COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP; CESAR AGUILA. (Flock, John) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION;. (Flock, John) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 22STCV19314 Receipt No: ACACDC-35784647 - Fee: $402, filed by defendant COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION;. (Attorney John K Flock added to party COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION;(pty:dft))(Flock, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
