Henry Ho v. First Republic Bank et al
| Henry Ho |
| First Republic Bank and Does 1-10 |
| 2:2023cv06317 |
| August 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael R Wilner |
| George H Wu |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c filed by Pltf Henry Ho. The Pltf does not consent. (Siegel, Elliot) |
Filing 10
ORDER GRANTING STAY OF ENTIRE ACTION FOR NINETY DAYS PURSUANT TO 12 U.S.C. 1821(d)(12) by Judge George H. Wu. FDIC-R's Request is GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this matter is stayed for Ninety (90) Days, until November 14, 2023, pending the exhaustion of plaintiff's statutorily mandated remedies. The Court sets a status conference for November 20, 2023 at 8:30 a.m. The parties are to file a joint report by November 15, 2023.; granting #8 REQUEST to Stay Case pending STAY OF ENTIRE ACTION FOR NINETY DAYS. (aco)
|
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE JUDGE GEORGE H. WU by Judge George H. Wu. You are instructed to read and to follow (unless otherwise superseded herein) the Central District of California Local Rules (henceforth "Local Rules") 16-1 through 16-15 regarding pre-trial requirements. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (aco)
|
| Filing 8 REQUEST to Stay Case pending STAY OF ENTIRE ACTION FOR NINETY DAYS filed by Defendant First Republic Bank. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Zuber, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue to Judge George H. Wu for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:23-cv-06317 GW(MRWx). (rn) |
| Filing 6 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Defendant First Republic Bank. (Zuber, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 5 Notice CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE AND FILING OF NOTICE TO AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION AND TO CLAIMANT OF REMOVAL TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT filed by Defendant First Republic Bank. (Zuber, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (sh) |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF AMENDED ARBITRATION against Defendants Does, First Republic Bank., filed by Plaintiff Henry Ho. [STATE COURT FILE DATE NOT INDICATED SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 1 TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant First Republic Bank, identifying Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for First Republic Bank. (Zuber, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant First Republic Bank. (Zuber, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from American Arbitration Association, case number 01-23-0002-6828 Fee Exemption in accordance with statute, filed by Defendant First Republic Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D) (Attorney Jeffrey J. Zuber added to party First Republic Bank(pty:dft))(Zuber, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
