Joseph Hong v. FCA US LLC et al
| Joseph Hong |
| FCA US LLC and Does 1 through 20, inclusive |
| 2:2023cv06365 |
| August 4, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stanley Blumenfeld |
| Charles F Eick |
| Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The parties filed a notice of settlement on September 14, 2023. This action is therefore dismissed in its entirety without prejudice. For 90 days from the date of this order, the Court retains jurisdiction to vacate this order and to reopen the action nunc pro tunc on motion of any party. If any party objects to this order, both parties shall appear as scheduled for the conference on September 15, 2023 to discuss the objection. Otherwise, this order will be deemed to have been entered without objection. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (jgr)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Settlement JOINT filed by plaintiff Joseph Hong. (Barry, David) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Douglas A Proudfoot on behalf of Defendant FCA US LLC (Attorney Douglas A Proudfoot added to party FCA US LLC(pty:dft))(Proudfoot, Douglas) |
| Filing 11 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 3-5 days, filed by Plaintiff Joseph Hong.. (Barry, David) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The Court sets an in-person Mandatory Scheduling Conference set for hearing on September 15, 2023 at 8:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. The parties shall file a Joint Rule 26(f) Report by September 5, 2023. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. (jgr)
|
|
Filing 9
CIVIL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr)
|
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (et) |
| CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF ANSWER TO COMPLAINT filed by Defendant FCA US LLC. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 8/3/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL AS ATTACHMENT NO. 2 #1 .(et) |
| CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants FCA US LLC, Does 1 through 20, inclusive. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Joseph Hong. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 6/30/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 . (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant FCA US LLC, identifying FCA US LLC. (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Matthew M Proudfoot on behalf of Defendant FCA US LLC (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Matthew M. Proudfoot re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant FCA US LLC. (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant FCA US LLC. (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 23STCV15379 Receipt No: ACACDC-35798514 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant FCA US LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons & Complaint - State Court, #2 Answer to Complaint - State Court) (Attorney Matthew M Proudfoot added to party FCA US LLC(pty:dft))(Proudfoot, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
