Merritt Lee Austin v. United States of America et al
Merritt Lee Austin |
United States of America, Jaspal Dhawliwal, Jason Christopher, Williams Watson and Galyna Mischenko |
2:2023cv06453 |
August 3, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Maria A Audero |
Sherilyn Peace Garnett |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Merritt Lee Austin. (es) |
Filing 11 REQUEST for Status Report filed by Plaintiff Merritt Lee Austin. (es) |
Filing 10 MINUTES (In Chambers): Order Regarding Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 6) by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero: Before the Court is Plaintiff Merritt Lee Austin's ("Plaintiff") Motion for Appointment of Counsel ("Motion"). (ECF No. #6 .) For these reasons, Plaintiff's Motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED without prejudice. [SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.] (es) |
Filing 9 INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER IN CIVIL RIGHTS CASE by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. Plaintiff is advised that the Court presently is screening the Complaint in this action, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) and 28 U.S.C. 1915A. Until the Complaint has been screened and the Court has ordered that service of process may occur, Plaintiff may not proceed with service of process upon Defendant(s). Should the Court determine that the Complaint may be served upon any or all Defendant(s), the Court will issue a separate order regarding service of process. [SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.] (Attachments: #1 Attachment CV-11) (es) |
Filing 8 ORDER by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett Granting #2 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee. Re REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support #2 . It is further ORDERED that the prisoner-plaintiff owes the Court the initial filing fee of $350.00. An initial partial filing fee of $39.32 must be paid within 30 days of the date of this order. Thereafter, monthly payments shall be forwarded to the Court in accordance with this order. (bm) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES (Local Rule 7.1-1) filed by Plaintiff Merritt Lee Austin (es) |
Filing 6 Plaintiff's MOTION for Appointment of Counsel and Brief in Support filed by Plaintiff Merritt Lee Austin. (es) |
Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) Order Regarding Notice of Interested Parties by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero: Plaintiff is ordered to comply with Local Rule 7.1-1 FORTHWITH and by no later than September 14, 2023. [SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.] (Attachments: #1 Attachment) (es) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett and referred to Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (ghap) |
Filing 3 MOTION TO BRING CLAIM UNDER 1346(b) filed by plaintiff Merritt Lee Austin. (ghap) |
Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Merritt Lee Austin. (ghap) |
Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Jason Christopher, Jaspal Dhawliwal, Galyna Mischenko, United States of America, Williams Watson pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett and referred to Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero., filed by plaintiff Merritt Lee Austin. (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.