Junjie Cai v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
Junjie Cai |
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, David Radel, Merrick Garland, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Civil Process Clerk, United States Attorney Office and Central District of California |
2:2023cv06487 |
August 9, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Stephanie S Christensen |
Michael W Fitzgerald |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY THE CASE PENDING ADJUDICATION OF APPLICATION #14 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. The instant action shall be stayed until February 16, 2024. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (iv) |
Filing 14 Joint STIPULATION to Stay Case pending ADJUDICATION OF APPLICATION filed by Defendants Central District of California, Civil Process Clerk, Merrick Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, David Radel, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proof of Service)(Attorney Yujin Chun added to party Central District of California(pty:dft), Attorney Yujin Chun added to party Civil Process Clerk(pty:dft), Attorney Yujin Chun added to party Merrick Garland(pty:dft), Attorney Yujin Chun added to party Ur M. Jaddou(pty:dft), Attorney Yujin Chun added to party Alejandro Mayorkas(pty:dft), Attorney Yujin Chun added to party David Radel(pty:dft), Attorney Yujin Chun added to party U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services(pty:dft))(Chun, Yujin) |
Filing 13 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 as to Defendant Ur M. Jaddou. (iv) |
Filing 12 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 as to Defendant Alejandro Mayorkas. (iv) |
Filing 11 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 as to Defendant U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. (iv) |
Filing 10 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 as to Defendant Merrick Garland. (iv) |
Filing 9 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 as to Defendant David Radel. (iv) |
Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 as to Defendant Civil Process Clerk. (iv) |
Filing 7 SELF-REPRESENTATION ORDER by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (iv) |
Filing 6 ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS #3 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. The Request is DENIED. Within 30 days of the date of this Order, the filer must do the following: Pay the $402 filing fee. (iv) |
Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Stephanie S Christensen. (sh) |
Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Junjie Cai. (sh) |
Filing 2 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Junjie Cai, (sh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Central District of California, Civil Process Clerk, Merrick Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, David Radel, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Attorney Office.Case assigned to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Stephanie S. Christensen., filed by Plaintiff Junjie Cai. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Merrick Garland, #3 Alejandro Mayorkas, #4 David Radel, #5 Civil Process Clerk, #6 US Citizenship and Immigration, #7 U.R. M Jaddou) (sh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.