Allodial American National Private Trust et al v. The State Bar of California et al
Cynthia Harris-Bey, Allodial American National Private Trust, Cynthia Harris, Harris Cynthia, Joseph L. Harris and Dominic M. Contreras |
The State Bar of California, Los Angeles County Superior Court of California, Department of Children and Family Services, Annabelle G. Cortez and Fernando Amendola |
2:2023cv06558 |
August 9, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Stanley Blumenfeld |
Rozella A Oliver |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Mail Returned addressed to Cynthia Harris-Bey re Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112A) #7 . (gk) |
Filing 11 Mail Returned addressed to Cynthia Harris-Bey re Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112A) #7 . (gk) |
Filing 10 Mail Returned addressed to Cynthia Harris-Bey re Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge #6 . (gk) |
Filing 9 Mail Returned addressed to Cynthia Harris-Bey re Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) #5 . (gk) |
Filing 8 ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: Denying #2 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis because: The action is frivolous or malicious. The action fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. As explained in the attached statement, because it is absolutely clear that the deficiencies in the complaint cannot be cured by amendment, this case is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. ( MD JS-6, Case Terminated. ) (gk) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Consent to Proceed before US Magistrate Judge - DECLINED by Party #3 . The following error(s) was/were found: The filing of a Declination Statement of Consent to Proceed before a Magistrate Judge only applies to cases under the "Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program", wherein the initial judge assignment as the presider of the case is assigned to a magistrate judge. This case is not under that program. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (rn) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (ghap) |
Filing 3 STATEMENT OF CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c filed by Plaintiff Cynthia Harris-Bey. The Plaintiff does not consent. (ghap) |
Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Cynthia Harris-Bey. (ghap) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Fernando Amendola, Annabelle G. Cortez, Department of Children and Family Services, Los Angeles County Superior Court of California, The State Bar of California.Case assigned to Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Cynthia Harris-Bey. (Attachments: #1 CV-71, #2 Summons, #3 Summons) (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.