Raimundo Mendoza Cantarero v. Worldwide Flight Services, Inc. et al
RAIMUNDO MENDOZA CANTARERO |
Worldwide Flight Services, Inc. and Does 1 through 100, inclusive |
2:2023cv06604 |
August 11, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Stanley Blumenfeld |
Rozella A Oliver |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr) |
Filing 18 PRETRIAL AND TRIAL ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr) |
Filing 17 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr: PLEASE READ THIS ORDER (AND ATTACHMENT) CAREFULLY: The post-settlement status conference is set for June 28, 2024 at 8:30 AM. The pretrial conference is set for August 23, 2024 at 10:00 AM. The jury trial is set for September 9, 2024 at 8:30 AM. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DATES AND DEADLINES. (jgr) |
Filing 16 MINUTES OF Mandatory Scheduling Conference held before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: Counsel for Plaintiff, John Litwin appears remotely via Zoom without leave of court. The Court admonishes Plaintiff's counsel for violating this Court's order denying the parties' joint request to appear remotely. Dkt. No. 15 . The Court hears from the parties about the contents of their joint Rule 26(f) report. The parties will meet and confer to discuss whether they will consent to proceeding before a magistrate judge. A case management order shall be issued separately. Court Reporter: Myra Ponce. (jgr) |
Filing 15 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The Court denies the parties' joint request that they be permitted to attend the mandatory scheduling conference (MSC) remotely. Melissa Huether is permitted to attend the MSC in place of James Fessenden so long as she is prepared to discuss the issues raised in the Joint 26(f) Report. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jgr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 14 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 10-14 days, filed by Defendant Worldwide Flight Services, Inc... (Attachments: #1 Declaration of James C. Fessenden in Support of Request to Remotely Appear or, in the Alternative, for Non-Lead Counsel to Appear at Mandatory Scheduling Conference)(Huether, Melissa) |
Filing 13 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 12 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (ghap) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT #5 Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #6 , Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge #7 . Document number 5, 6 and 7 due to clerical error. The docket clerk failed to attach the entire image of thenew action. (ghap) |
Filing 9 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The Court sets an in-person Mandatory Scheduling Conference set for hearing on September 15, 2023 at 8:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. The parties shall file a Joint Rule 26(f) Report by September 5, 2023. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. (jgr) |
Filing 8 CIVIL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr) |
Filing 7 [NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR ISSUED ON 8/16/2023, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. 10] Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) Modified on 8/16/2023 (ghap). |
Filing 6 [NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR ISSUED ON 8/16/2023, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. 10] NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) Modified on 8/16/2023 (ghap). |
Filing 5 [NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR ISSUED ON 8/16/2023, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. 10] NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (ghap) Modified on 8/16/2023 (ghap). |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Worldwide Flight Services, Inc. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 8/11/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT C)(ghap) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 100, inclusive, Worldwide Flight Services, Inc. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Raimundo Mendoza Cantarero. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 7/10/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Worldwide Flight Services, Inc., identifying SATS, Ltd.; Worldwide Flight Services, Inc.; Raimundo Mendoza Cantarero. (Fessenden, James) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Worldwide Flight Services, Inc. identifying SATS, Ltd. as Corporate Parent. (Fessenden, James) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Worldwide Flight Services, Inc.. (Fessenden, James) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 23STCV15967 Receipt No: ACACDC-35845278 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Worldwide Flight Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Initial Status Conference Order, #3 Exhibit C - Answer and Affirmative Defenses, #4 Exhibit D - Notice to Adverse Party, #5 Exhibit E - Notice to State Court of Removal, #6 Declaration Decl of James C. Fessenden, #7 Declaration Decl of Athena Sherron) (Attorney James C Fessenden added to party Worldwide Flight Services, Inc.(pty:dft))(Fessenden, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.