Niannian Li v. Jaddou Ur Mendoza et al
Niannian Li |
Jaddou Ur Mendoza, Susan M. Curda and Corina Luna |
2:2023cv06608 |
August 12, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Maria A Audero |
John A Kronstadt |
Other Immigration Actions |
05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER Re Joint Stipulation to Stay Case Pending Adjudication of Application (Dkt. #10 ); JS-6: CASE INACTIVE/STAYED by Judge John A. Kronstadt, the Stipulation is APPROVED, as follows: All proceedings in this action are STAYED until 1/8/2025. The parties shall file a joint report on the earlier of every 60 days, or within 10 days of any material development in the administrative proceedings, including any modification of the 8/27/2024 interview date. The first 60-day report shall be filed no later than 12/11/2023. On or before the earlier of 1/8/2025, or within 10 days following the adjudication of Plaintiffs I-589 Application for Asylum and for Withholding of Removal pending before the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, the parties shall file a joint report regarding the status of the application. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp) |
Filing 10 Joint STIPULATION to Stay Case filed by Defendant Susan M. Curda, Corina Luna, Jaddou Ur Mendoza. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Anthony John Messuri added to party Susan M. Curda(pty:dft), Attorney Anthony John Messuri added to party Corina Luna(pty:dft), Attorney Anthony John Messuri added to party Jaddou Ur Mendoza(pty:dft))(Messuri, Anthony) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Oil Appellate on behalf of Defendants Susan M. Curda, Corina Luna, Jaddou Ur Mendoza (Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Susan M. Curda(pty:dft), Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Corina Luna(pty:dft), Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Jaddou Ur Mendoza(pty:dft))(Appellate, Oil) |
Filing 8 STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (tj) |
Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Susan M. Curda, Corina Luna, Jaddou Ur Mendoza. (ghap) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (ghap) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff NIANNIAN LI, (Spence, Joel) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff NIANNIAN LI. (Spence, Joel) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff NIANNIAN LI. (Spence, Joel) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35845522 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff NIANNIAN LI. (Attorney Joel E Spence added to party NIANNIAN LI(pty:pla))(Spence, Joel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.