Yuri Doering v. Jose Luis Acosta et al
| Yuri Doering |
| Jose Luis Acosta, Jr. and Does 1 to 10 |
| 2:2023cv06624 |
| August 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 JUDGMENT by Judge Mark C. Scarsi : Pursuant to the Courts Order of Dismissal #17 , it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that this case is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff shall take nothing from this action. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc) |
Filing 17
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: ORDER OF DISMISSAL.The Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why the ADA claim should not be dismissed without prejudice for lack of standing. Plaintiff filed a response. Plaintiff asks for leave to amend the Complaint. The Court "is powerless to grant leave to amend when it lacks jurisdiction over the original complaint." The ADA claim is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. The Court declines supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs remaining state law claims. The Court directs the Clerk to enter judgment and close the case. (lc)
|
| Filing 16 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Yuri Doeringto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, #13 re: Standing (Kim, Jason) |
|
Filing 15
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: ORDER DECLINING SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION. The Court has reviewed and considered Plaintiff's response #14 . The Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs Unruh Act claim and any other construction-related accessibility claim. The Court therefore dismisses any such claims without prejudice. (lc)
|
| Filing 14 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Yuri Doeringto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive-form only-no proceeding held #11 re: Supplemental Jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Kim, Jason) |
|
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. The Court orders Plaintiff to show cause why the ADA claim should not be dismissed without prejudice for lack of standing and why the Court should not decline jurisdiction over the remaining claims. Plaintiff shall respond in writing within 14 days. Failure to file a timely and satisfactory response will be construed as a concession that Plaintiff lacks standing to pursue the ADA claim and will result in dismissal without further notice. (lc)
|
| Filing 12 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (smo) |
|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause (ADA) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 8/30/2023. (smo)
|
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) Order re Prosecution of Certain Cases Under the Americans With Disabilities Act by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
|
Filing 9
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Jose Luis Acosta, Jr. (et) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Yuri Doering. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Yuri Doering. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35849567 - Fee: $402. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party Yuri Doering(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
