Ricardo Quiroz v. FCA US LLC et al
| RICARDO QUIROZ |
| FCA US LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, FCA US LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2023cv06737 |
| August 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stephanie S Christensen |
| Otis D Wright |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 BRIEF filed by Plaintiff Ricardo Quiroz. Plaintiff's Brief in Response to the Order to Show Cause Why Action Should Not Be Remanded for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction regarding Response, #10 , Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Set/Reset Deadlines,, #9 . (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Maite Colon in Support of Plaintiff's Brief in Response to the Order to Show Cause Why Action Should Not Be Remanded For Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, #2 Exhibit A to Decl of M. Colon, #3 Exhibit B to Decl of M. Colon, #4 Exhibit C to Decl of M. Colon, #5 Exhibit D to Decl of M. Colon, #6 Exhibit E to Decl of M. Colon, #7 Exhibit F to Decl of M. Colon, #8 Exhibit G to Decl of M. Colon)(Colon, Maite) |
| Filing 11 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Maite Christine Colon counsel for Plaintiff Ricardo Quiroz. Adding Maite Colon as counsel of record for Ricardo Quiroz for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Ricardo Quiroz. (Attorney Maite Christine Colon added to party Ricardo Quiroz(pty:pla))(Colon, Maite) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE filed by Defendant FCA US LLCto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Set/Reset Deadlines,, #9 DEFENDANT FCA US LLCS RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE REMANDED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Scott S. Shepardson)(Shepardson, Scott) |
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER (In Chambers): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re: Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Amount in Controversy) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Defendant removed this case and therefore bears the burden of establishing subject matter jurisdiction. Defendant is therefore ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE, in writing only, to be received by the Court no later than September 6, 2023, why this action should not be remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction due to an insufficient amount in controversy. Failure to timely respond to this Order shall result in a remand without further warning. Plaintiffs may, but are not required to, file a written Reply to Defendant's Response, to be received by the Court no later than September 20, 2023. (lom)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER that the Scheduling Conference is set for October 23, 2023 at 1:30 PM ; compliance with FRCP 16, and 26(f) and filing of joint report; Counsel for plaintiff shall immediately serve this Order on all parties, including any new parties to the action by Judge Otis D Wright, II. (lc)
|
|
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY- No mandatory chambers copies required, EXCEPT FOR EXCEPT FOR motions for summary judgment and any other evidence-heavy motions. The Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) allows people without lawyers who have pending cases in the US District Court for the Central District of California to submit documents electronically to the Clerks Office The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to Court's Website and Judge's procedures for information as applicable. (lc)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Stephanie S. Christensen. (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, FCA US LLC. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Ricardo Quiroz. (FILED IN VENTURA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 6/30/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant FCA US LLC. (FILED IN VENTURA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 8/16/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 )(lh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant FCA US LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, identifying FCA US LLC; FCA North America Holdings LLC; FCA Holdco B.V.; Stellantis N.V. (formerly known as Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V.). (Shepardson, Scott) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant FCA US LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company. (Shepardson, Scott) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Ventura Superior Court, case number 2023CUBC010889 Receipt No: ACACDC-35871441 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant FCA US LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Scott S. Shepardson, #2 Exhibit A to Declaration of Scott S. Shepardson, #3 Exhibit B to Declaration of Scott S. Shepardson, #4 Exhibit C to Declaration of Scott S. Shepardson, #5 Exhibit D to Declaration of Scott S. Shepardson, #6 Exhibit e to Declaration of Scott S. Shepardson) (Attorney Scott Steven Shepardson added to party FCA US LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company(pty:dft))(Shepardson, Scott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
