Darlene Kanenbley v. Winco Holdings, Inc. et al
Darlene Kanenbley |
Winco Holdings, Inc. and Does 1-50, Inclusive |
2:2023cv06738 |
August 16, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John D Early |
Jean P Rosenbluth |
Josephine L Staton |
Stephen V Wilson |
Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 21 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Counsel and/or the parties are advised that the Court has updated its procedures in civil cases, including procedures encouraging consent to the magistrate judge in ordinary civil cases; setting forth presumptive schedules for class certification motion briefing; simplifying the requirements for substituting named defendants for Doe defendants; clarifying requirements for submission of mandatory chambers copies of voluminous exhibits; substituting compliance with the Local Rule regarding limitations on the number of words in the parties briefing for the Courts previous page limitations on briefing; imposing further limitations on the number of words in reply briefs; updating the Courts procedures in the case of settlement, including procedures for orders imposing stays of proceedings, orders of dismissal, and retention of jurisdiction by the Court; imposing limitations on both the number of and the content of motions in limine; and clarifying trial exhibit preparation, including the requirement to prepare a separate binder of exhibits for each witness. These updates are found on the Courts procedures page, and/or the Courts Initial Standing Order and Civil Trial Order, attached thereto. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cbr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
|
Filing 19 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (gga) |
Filing 18 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to November 17, 2023 re Complaint - (Discovery), Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) #11 filed by Defendant Winco Holdings, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kopp, Michael) |
|
Filing 16 Third STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Winco Holdings, Inc. answer now due 9/22/2023, filed by Defendant Winco Holdings, Inc..(Kopp, Michael) |
Filing 15 Joint STIPULATION to Stay Case pending resolution of all earlier filed cases filed by Defendant Winco Holdings, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Michael Kopp in Support of the Parties' Joint Stipulation to Stay the Action)(Kopp, Michael) |
Filing 14 Second STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Winco Holdings, Inc. answer now due 9/13/2023, re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by defendant Winco Holdings, Inc..(Kopp, Michael) |
|
|
Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Winco Holdings, Inc. answer now due 8/30/2023, re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by defendant Winco Holdings, Inc..(Kopp, Michael) |
Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by defendant Winco Holdings, Inc., re Notice (Other) #6 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #4 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #8 , Notice of Related Case(s) #5 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #9 , Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #7 served on 8/17/23 and 8/18/23. (Kopp, Michael) |
Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (ghap) |
NON CONFORMED COPY OF NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Darlene Kanenbley, upon Defendant Winco Holdings, Inc. acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 6/27/2023, answer due 7/18/2023. Acknowledgment of Service signed by Michael W Kopp, Winco Holdings, Inc., an Idaho Corporation. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL) (ghap) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-50, Inclusive, Winco Holdings, Inc., filed by plaintiff Darlene Kanenbley. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 6/26/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL) (ghap) |
Filing 6 Notice of Pendency of Other Actions or Proceedings filed by defendant Winco Holdings, Inc.. (Kopp, Michael) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by defendant Winco Holdings, Inc.. Related Case(s): 2:22-cv-05572-JLS-JDE, 5:23-cv-00976-JLS-JDE (Kopp, Michael) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Winco Holdings, Inc. (Kopp, Michael) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Winco Holdings, Inc., identifying Plaintiff Darlene Kanenbley, Defendant WinCo Holdings, Inc.. (Kopp, Michael) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Winco Holdings, Inc.. (Kopp, Michael) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 23PSCV01897 Receipt No: ACACDC-35871449 - Fee: $402, filed by defendant Winco Holdings, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Complaint and other served documents, #2 Exhibit 2 - Signed Notice and Acknowledgment of Receipt, #3 Declaration of Ben Swanson) (Attorney Michael W Kopp added to party Winco Holdings, Inc.(pty:dft))(Kopp, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.