Luiz E Lima De Moraes v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. et al
| Luiz E Lima De Moraes |
| Greyhound Lines, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2023cv06764 |
| August 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Alka Sagar |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: The court, on its own motion, CONTINUES the Scheduling Conference to October 27, 2023 at 1:30 p.m.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tf) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 13 RESPONSE filed by Defendant Greyhound Lines, Inc.to Order to Show Cause, #11 Response to Order to Show Cause Why Action Should Not Be Remanded for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdication (Cahill, Jonathan) |
|
Filing 12
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: The court, on its own motion, continues the Motion to Dismiss Case (Dkt. #7 ) and Motion to Strike Complaint (Dkt. #8 ) from September 29, 2023 to October 27, 2023, at 1:30 p.m.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tf) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE REMANDED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION BY PARTIES IN WRITING NO LATER THAN 14 DAYS FROM DATE OF THIS ORDER. RESPONSES SHALL BE LIMITED TO 10 PAGES (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFICS). by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (lc)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. Scheduling Conference set for 10/13/2023 at 01:00 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
|
|
Filing 9
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's Complaint Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Greyhound Lines, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 9/29/2023 at 01:30 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Rambarran, Ian) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Greyhound Lines, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 9/29/2023 at 01:30 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Rambarran, Ian) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Greyhound Lines, Inc. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Luiz E Lima De Moraes. (FILED IN STATE COURT 6/5/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1) (ghap) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES filed by Defendant Greyhound Lines, Inc. identifying Flix North America, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Rambarran, Ian) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Greyhound Lines, Inc.. (Rambarran, Ian) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 23LBCV00973 Receipt No: ACACDC-35876975 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Greyhound Lines, Inc.. (Attorney Ian A Rambarran added to party Greyhound Lines, Inc.(pty:dft))(Rambarran, Ian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
