Bingrui Ji v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al.
| BINGRUI JI |
| SECRETARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and Alejandro Mayorkas |
| 2:2023cv06832 |
| August 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Wesley L Hsu |
| A Joel Richlin |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY CASE PENDING ADJUDICATION OF APPLICATION #15 by Judge Wesley L. Hsu: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the instant action shall be stayed and administratively closed until January 15, 2025. The parties shall file a joint status report on January 15, 2025, if the action has not been dismissed by that date. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (bm)
|
| Filing 15 Joint STIPULATION to Stay Case pending Adjudication of Application filed by Defendant Alejandro Mayorkas. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney David Kim added to party Alejandro Mayorkas(pty:dft))(Kim, David) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Oil Appellate on behalf of Defendant Alejandro Mayorkas (Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Alejandro Mayorkas(pty:dft))(Appellate, Oil) |
| Filing 13 PLAINTIFF'S CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by PLAINTIFF Bingrui Ji, (Pickering, Lisa) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER IN RESPONSE TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCES IN FILED DOCUMENT RE: Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #10 by Judge Wesley L. Hsu. A notice of interested parties shall be filed no later than 5 days from entry of this Order. (lom)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Amended Certificate of Interested Parties - form is blank. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lom) |
| Filing 10 AMENDED CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by PLAINTIFF Bingrui Ji, (Pickering, Lisa) |
| Filing 9 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Alejandro Mayorkas. (et) |
| Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE WESLEY L. HSU. (hc) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Wesley L. Hsu and Magistrate Judge A. Joel Richlin. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by PLAINTIFF BINGRUI JI. (Attachments: #1 Supplement FIRST PAGE OF COMPLAINT)(Pickering, Lisa) |
| Filing 3 PLAINTIFF'S CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by PLAINTIFF BINGRUI JI, (Pickering, Lisa) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff BINGRUI JI. (Pickering, Lisa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35888211 - Fee: $402, filed by PLAINTIFF BINGRUI JI. (Attorney Lisa Pickering added to party BINGRUI JI(pty:pla))(Pickering, Lisa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
