DKR Consulting, LLC v. Shopify, Inc.
DKR Consulting, LLC |
Shopify, Inc. |
2:2023cv06904 |
August 22, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jacqueline Chooljian |
Hernan D Vera |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 145 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 REQUEST for foreign service on Shopify, Inc. filed by Plaintiff DKR Consulting, LLC (Perkowski, Peter) |
Filing 16 ORDER by Judge Hernan D. Vera Granting #13 Non-Resident Attorney Chandran B Iyer APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff DKR Consulting LLC, designating Peter Edward Perkowski as local counsel. (bm) |
Filing 15 ORDER by Judge Hernan D. Vera Granting #12 Non-Resident Attorney Ronald M Dignault APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff DKR Consulting LLC, designating Peter Edward Perkowski as local counsel. (bm) |
Filing 14 CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Hernan D. Vera. PLEASE READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT GOVERNS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (lom) |
Filing 13 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Ramachandran B. Iyer to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff DKR Consulting, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-35941393) filed by Plaintiff DKR Consulting, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Perkowski, Peter) |
Filing 12 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Ronald M. Daignault to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff DKR Consulting, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-35941287) filed by Plaintiff DKR Consulting, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Perkowski, Peter) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Chandran B. Iyer on behalf of Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Ronald M. Daignault on behalf of Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) |
Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Shopify, Inc. (et) |
Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Hernan D. Vera and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (et) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff DKR Consulting, LLC. (Perkowski, Peter) |
Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by DKR Consulting, LLC. (Perkowski, Peter) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff DKR Consulting, LLC, identifying DKR Consulting, Inc. and Shopify, Inc.. (Perkowski, Peter) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff DKR Consulting, LLC. (Perkowski, Peter) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35902059 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff DKR Consulting, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4) (Attorney Peter E. Perkowski added to party DKR Consulting, LLC(pty:pla))(Perkowski, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: DKR Consulting, LLC v. Shopify, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: DKR Consulting, LLC | |
Represented By: | Peter E. Perkowski |
Represented By: | Ramachandran B. Iyer |
Represented By: | Ronald M. Daignault |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Shopify, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.