George Diaz v. General Motors LLC et al
| George Diaz |
| General Motors LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2023cv06987 |
| August 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles County Superior Court, Lancaster, No. 23AVCV00912. (lc) |
Filing 19
ORDER REMANDING CASE AND DENYING PENDING MOTIONS #14 , #18 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: Defendant has not shown the Court has subject-matter jurisdiction over the case, and remand is therefore appropriate. The Court remands the case to Los Angeles County Superior Court, No. 23AVCV00912. The pending motions are denied as moot. The Court directs the Clerk to effect the remand and close the case. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc)
|
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff George Diaz. Motion set for hearing on 10/23/2023 at 09:00 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (Marden, Ryan) |
| Filing 17 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff George Diaz, (Marden, Ryan) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Consent to Proceed before US Magistrate Judge - DECLINED by Party #15 . The following error(s) was/were found: The filing of a Declination Statement of Consent to Proceed before a Magistrate Judge only applies to cases under the "Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program", wherein the initial judge assignment as the presider of the case is assigned to a magistrate judge. This case is not under that program. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (rn) |
| Filing 15 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c. (Marden, Ryan) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant General Motors LLC. Motion set for hearing on 10/16/2023 at 09:00 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet of Peter A. Strotz in Support of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, #2 Proposed Order) (Strotz, Peter) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE filed by Defendant General Motors LLCto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, #10 (Attachments: #1 Declaration Of Timothy M. Kuhn In Support of General Motors LLC's Response, #2 Exhibit A - Global Warranty Management, #3 Declaration Of Peter A. Strotz In Support of General Motors LLC's Response, #4 Exhibit Sales Agreement)(Strotz, Peter) |
|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: ORDER ON STIPULATION EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT TO SEPTEMBER 13, 2023. NO OTHER DEADLINES ARE MODIFIED BY THIS ORDER #11 . (lc)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to General Motors LLC answer now due 9/13/2023, re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant General Motors LLC.(Priestley, Brian) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION. The Court orders Defendant to show cause why the case should not be remanded for lack of jurisdiction. Defendant shall file a written response within 14 days either acknowledging the Court lacks diversity jurisdiction or establishing by a preponderance of evidence that the amount in controversy "more likely than not" exceeds $75,000.00. Plaintiff may respond to Defendant's response within seven days of its filing. (lc)
|
|
Filing 9
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (sh) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant General Motors LLC, re Corporate Disclosure Statement #4 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on August 24, 2023. (Priestley, Brian) |
| CONFORMED EFILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, General Motors LLC., filed by Plaintiff George Diaz.[FILED IN STATE COURT 08/10/2023 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 1 EXHIBIT A TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 filed by Defendant General Motors LLC (Priestley, Brian) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant General Motors LLC, (Priestley, Brian) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant General Motors LLC. (Priestley, Brian) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 23AVCV00912 Receipt No: ACACDC-35915866 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant General Motors LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Pleadings, #3 Declaration of Timothy Kuhn, #4 Exhibit A to Timothy Kuhn Declaration, #5 Exhibit B to Timothy Kuhn Declaration, #6 Exhibit C to Timothy Kuhn Declaration, #7 Exhibit D to Timothy Kuhn Declaration, #8 Exhibit E to Timothy Kuhn Declaration) (Attorney Brian Priestley added to party General Motors LLC(pty:dft))(Priestley, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
