Yuri Doering v. Angelina Barr et al
| Yuri Doering |
| Angelina Barr doing business as Sunshine Designs Flower Shop, Krystal Enterprises LLC and Does 1 to 10 |
| 2:2023cv07004 |
| August 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong |
| Steve Kim |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Yuri Doering, upon Defendant Krystal Enterprises LLC served on 10/17/2023, answer due 11/7/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon VERONICA ESCAMILLA, AS AGENT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 13
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFFS STATE LAW CLAIMS by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by no later than fourteen days from the date of this order. The failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim, the California Disabled Persons Act claim, the California Health and Safety Code claim, and the negligence claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(c). (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm)
|
| Filing 12 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's website under Judge Frimpong's Procedures and Schedules. Please read the Standing Order carefully. It is the responsibilities of the parties to maintain familiarly with the Standing Order and any future amendments that the Court may issue by periodically checking the Court's website for the operative version of the Standing Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kd) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
|
Filing 11
CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. (kd)
|
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Angelina Barr, Krystal Enterprises LLC. (ghap) |
| Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Yuri Doering. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Yuri Doering, (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Yuri Doering. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Yuri Doering. correcting Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Yuri Doering. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35920585 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Yuri Doering. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party Yuri Doering(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
